23 Oct 2022, 05:35

alt text


Senate to not vote on neutrality amendment proposal

Amendment to add a neutrality question to the 2023 referendum will not be discussed in the Senate, says Speaker
October 23, 2022


This afternoon, Speaker of the Senate May Hobbes announced that the neutrality amendment proposal would not be put up for discussion in the Senate. The proposal would add a proposal on whether Elthize should be neutral in the 2023 reform referendum. The exact proposal, submitted by Labour MA Basil Osborne, was defeated 130-118 in the National Assembly, and it was expected for a senator to put a similar bill into the Senate. However, when Labour Senator Erle Thrussell proposed the bill for consideration of discussion, it was rejected, and vetoed, by Hobbes.

"I don't think this is a topic important enough to be discussed in the Senate right now," said Hobbes, explaining her decision to NET. "Likewise, it is not important enough to attempt to override the National Assembly's decision." Hobbes continued, stating: "We are acting too early, I think. I believe that we can have a more healthy discussion, once more about the neutrality plans of the President and the Councillor are revealed."

Councillor Liam Zachary and President Greenwich Grimwald are expected to meet up sometime in November to discuss a potential neutrality motion in the future.

The veto initiated by Hobbes was condemned by opposition figures as an undemocratic move. Matthew François, head of The Greens, stated: "It is tragic to see a rejection of democracy so stubborn. What does the President exactly fear?"

Others, however, praised Hobbes' decision. Francis Elvin, head of The Nationals, replied back to François: "How can we talk about democracy when the decision of a proper assembly is rejected? This circumvention is laughable. To be honest, the Senate should not even have the authority to send laws to the President on its own."

While the motion would have a better chance of passing through the Senate, many political experts say that it would be vetoed by Greenwich Grimwald anyway, making it pointless.

"It's no use. I mean, I didn't agree with that route, I feel like the decision of the National Assembly should be final. Grimwald would have vetoed it, but it's more about making a statement if that makes sense. It's important to at least show disapproval," Basil Osborne told NET.