24 Jul 2020, 01:10

van der Bijl/de la Rocque divide becomes clear

Eastern Haane has, despite the efforts of a number of politicians, become a horrific example of partisanship.

Once politically diverse and known for consensus, the country's opinions have become sharply divided between the party of van der Bijl (the United Front) and the party of de la Rocque (the Union of Guilds.)

All politically involved unions have swayed to one side or another; straying from the two's dogmas is heresy now.

The most common sense of actions is lambasted, by one side or another, as the beginning of dictatorship or the end of socialism.

Daily do people threaten others with death.

The division appears to have largely because of the issues of national self-determination and democracy.

van der Bijl believes that socialism itself inevitably protects it; de la Rocque believes that special institutions have to made for it to be so.

van der Bijl believes that, in her words, 'the people should hold an iron fist over all;' that is, she believes in a truly direct democracy.

de la Rocque, on the other hand, believes that 'representatives represent the interests of the whole; they act in the defense of the nation and the movement;' that is, in a trustee-model of representation.

These views are hardly ridiculous; both appear to be perfectly valid, and would be considered so a year ago.

And yet now protests and counter protests have sprung up everywhere over them; ridiculous conspiracy theories abound within each side about the other; and so on and so forth.

Something obviously must be done.