8 May 2023, 21:02

Duchies Cycling to abandon EDA bid
Duchies Cycling has said in critical comments that it would abandon the EDA bid if it is not processed within 7 days. The national cycling authority in charge of cycling policy has said in a statement "We put in a bid for a Cycle Super Highway system in April of last year and a bid for increased funding in January of this year which was solid and in line with European development goals as well as Duchian goals of delivering on sustainable development. All we have faced is beaurocracy from officials who do not understand transport in the duchies or cycling with one confirmed vote against the project already with the others having not voted delaying any potential acceptance. We were encouraged by the EU that sustainable development projects would be given funding as soon as the increased funding passed. We have waited for over a year for a decision , this is ridiculous and once again shows the EDA's inefficiency that even when it does have funds it never approves a project that is clearly in line with sustainable development in a timely manner.

Multiple projects have been funded by government schemes here and the Green European Fund yet EDA because of its structure cannot pass one. EDA has 1 week before we withdraw the application and look elswhere which will look bad as another failure of the EDA following the Azrekko Solar project failure. We also want an explanation of all votes and the reasons why Juncker voted against a project that clearly meets the goals of green transport development and getting families and more vulnerable user groups comfortable replacing car trips with bicycle trips within a 1 hour commute from cities into the country and in between more rural towns saving the environment. The EDA needs serious reform and to just work to get funding out and it needs it quick. The EU needs to make decisions on applications within its allotted time by law in a timely manner and get funding out for sustainable development or get out of the game of giving development funding altogether. Its no help having a process that could take over a year to get a no decision and with no accountability or any feedback to allow you to work on future bids with new knowledge. Do the job well or don't do it at all. We want the EU to unleash its power and for EU to work for the working class and middle class and all citizens but at present thats not the case, it has raw potential but unless its capitalised on its useless if it just is a Eurocratic centralised organisation that never gets anything done and is outshone by institutions like the Green European Fund and other funds every time due to its inefficiency."

James Mizrachi -Roscoe soon after condemned the EDA saying "Those in power constantly promise a Europe that works and does stuff and accuses people like myself who want reform to actually get money out to projects big a small through local boards as being anti-EU and trying to destroy the EU. But what is destroying the EU is them and the EPA do nothing commission which frankly is achieving nothing. They time and time again promise activity and for Europe to do more, and they can only organise one pathetic meeting of leaders in Europolis and rearranging the decks of the titanic. Is this what the EU unleashing its power looks like? We need a EU reform that grants national boards autonomy to administrate EU projects in nations with local contexts in mind and distribute funding and make decisions. The alternative is the mess we have now where a small team of Eurocrats in Europolis achieve nothing and where even getting simple development funding out takes over a year to get funding which results in agencies and organisations giving in and finding alternate sources of funding which means EDA gets no funding out. To get 0 Euros out of the EDA spent by April almost 6 months into a budget is pathetic. The EU needs to up its game and up it quick." We tried to find sources that praise the EU in the interests of impartiality but we could not find any despite asking around all parties and departments, we do as an organisation suggest that maybe the EU does need to improve on its delivery of funds from the programmes it funds and ask if the money is not being spent why does the EU take the money from the member states to distribute to said departments.