5 Dec 2022, 01:35

Catching up with Councillor Sofie Čikarová

alt text

Lex Burnley, in partnership between Inquista Today and the Europolis Post, sat down with with Councillor Sofie Čikarová to briefly discuss the European Commission, the European Council, and all of the latest in European politics.


LB: Councillor Čikarová, it’s good to talk to you! How are you? How has the adjustment from European Premier to European Councillor been?

SC: Thank you for having me, Lex! Well you know, it is certainly a different type of job, but there are similarities. In both occupations you are occupied with drafting legislation proposals. But it is true that you have to represent different types of interests. As a Commissioner, it is the interest of the Union itself, while as a Councillor I have to represent the interests of the Democratic Republic.

But to be honest, this wasn’t too difficult of a transition. You have to remember that one of the core tenets of Reiserová Thought is to always put the people at the centre. And that was my approach as the Premier Commissioner, and is still my approach now as a European Councillor. Nothing has changed in this regard and it never will change. And if you are consistent in your approach, any adjustments can be done swiftly and easily.

LB: I’m sure you are fully focused on your duties as Councillor, but is there a potential future where we see you put forward your name for Premier Commissioner again?

SC: Hm, that is a good question. You know, I’ve previously said that I don’t intend on ever running again. But now I must admit that this was perhaps a premature statement. I was hoping that there would be another generation of candidates inspired by our common victories. But now I must publicly admit that I was wrong. For some reason, and we could speculate what that reason is for hours, no new fighters have arisen to decide the direction of the Union. Instead, we have returned to the old ways with the Commissioners of the EPA. In my country, such a mistake couldn’t happen. No authority is forcing the people to cut their natural bond with the Great Leader, the people themselves have abolished all term limits, and the Great Leader, with great humbleness, heeded the demands of the people and accepted them. And from now on, I promise to act in a similar manner.

That is not to say that I will run again, but I will not make any statements regarding this. It all depends on the people. If people will want me to run again, I will. No matter what the people decide, I shall listen to further the cause of justice and equality.

LB: I'm sure there are some hoping to see you rejoin Commission politics sooner rather than later, especially now. What do you make of the current European Commission races? Many Europeans don’t seem keen on any of the current candidates.

SC: Horrible. A year and a half ago, I actually warned about something similar. I said that another success of EPA candidates could lead to a dangerous Commissioner being elected in the following elections, and now people can only vote for dangerous candidates! Of course, as we have seen, the majority of the people are voting for the incumbent despite him not running. But what will happen in the next election, after the incumbent won’t be allowed to serve for another term? It seems that unless we do something, a catastrophe is inevitable, and we know too well Mr. Juncker won’t do anything about it. It is upon us to act and save the Union.

And here I would also like to thank all the people that have voted for me despite the fact that I am neither running, nor in the office. It means a lot to me.

LB: From your experience, what does it take to be an effective European Commissioner?

SC: Willingness to listen, respect all opinions, and seek genuine improvements to your proposals. But always stand behind your programme. Never turn away from the people and defend their interests against the agents of the business in the Council. And a cup of coffee in the morning helps too.

LB: The European Council has not been a particularly busy body for a while now. What do you think of the current state of the European Council, and is there anything you would recommend to address this?

SC: Resignation.

LB: Nice. Bold. I like it. Your predecessor used to be chairperson of the European Left. It seems that eurogroups don’t really act as concerted bodies anymore, and they don’t seem to matter anymore at all, really. Do you think this is a symptom of broader European Council inactivity, or do you think this has actually caused Council inactivity?

SC: You know my predecessor actually left the Soocialist Republican Party after stepping down and lost paid posts within the Party. But I would be optimistic, Lex. The factual non-existence of the groups perhaps shows greater willingness of different Councillors to work together to improve the lives of the citizens of the member states of the Union. And that is good, we need to co-operate, not be driven by animosity and fanaticism.

LB: Absolutely. Is there any common ground, in your opinion, where Europe and the European Council come together to achieve something in a particular policy area?

SC: I’ll be honest, nothing comes to mind as of recently, since I have left the Premier Commissioner office. Hopefully the budget will be such a story.

LB: Has Councillor Tusk actually properly apologised to you about Nobel Parts Gate yet, and do you think he’s a misogynist?

SC: No, and nobody from his group offered an apology on his behalf, but that is in the past now. It is far more important to me that we are capable of working together on legislation, and I hope Councillor Tusk sees this the same way.

LB: Inquistan elections are coming up next year, which means your colleague, Councillor Lallana, will be facing election both as a bishop and as Inquista’s Councillor. Current polls suggest Bishop Lallana will not be re-elected to the European Council, and that someone more EPA-aligned or oriented is likely to win. Since Bishop Lallana has openly admired and supported you, and has jointly worked with you on numerous initiatives, would you ever endorse her for re-election? How would you assess her work as Inquista’s Councillor?

SC: Neither I, nor the Democratic Republic, will intervene in the elections in Inquista in any way and we will work with any representative of the Inquistan people or government.

But I will say that Karinn has been a great Councillor that has always tirelessly fought for her people in the Council. She is not one of those that would be fully in the pocket of the European monopolists and oligarchs. And this sadly can’t be said about all of my colleagues.

LB: Thank you for your time, Councillor. Hope to speak to you again soon.