I am against this sanction request, as it risks a possible famine for the Nicoleizian population living in the UNSR.
Münevver Birdane
Internal Affairs Commissioner of the European Union
Colleagues ( @Alkharya @Duxburian-Union ),
More than four member states have lodged a sanction request against the UNSR. Pursuant to the European Commission (Sanctioning Powers) Act, it is now up to the three of us to determine whether to grant the next step in the sanctioning process.
As you will have read in the original Request, the justification for sanctions against the UNSR is thus:
"Communist groups seized power in the territory of Icholasen last year, and have been a constant force for destabilisation and terror in the whole region. Our governments sincerely believe this regime must be toppled by whatever means necessary to ensure stability and peace in the region. The Kingdom of Montenbourg and the Empire of Inimicus, resolute in their friendship, request the Commission to enact region-wide sanctions against the Union of Nicolezian Socialist Republics, to isolate them from sources of arms, food, materials, and money, and to enact both economic, diplomatic, and individual sanctions against this regime. We stress the urgency of the current moment, realising the USNR have been free to act in whatever way they like thus far. This must stop."
I would like to ask both of you for your opinions on whether to grant this Request.
In line with the Sanctioning Act, this discussion will last until 24th March, 10am GMT at the latest, or earlier if a consensus is reached. I will then either prepare a Sanction Motion for the Council or dismiss the Request.
Dr Walter Cocx
Premier Commissioner
I am against this sanction request, as it risks a possible famine for the Nicoleizian population living in the UNSR.
Münevver Birdane
Internal Affairs Commissioner of the European Union
"Münevver, thank you for your honest opinion. I share your concern about the already impoverished state of the Nicolezian population. Fortunately, the Sanctions Act gives the Commission the power to propose exactly what sanctions are made. We could, for example, primarily include sanctions against individuals in government, diplomatic sanctions, and bans on exports of military equipment or raw materials to the UNSR, but leave food exports for what they are now.
"I would therefore propose to move forward with a package that includes widespread diplomatic sanctions as well as individual sanctions against members of the UNSR establishment, as well as a military arms export ban and a ban on exports of certain raw materials used in arms manufacturing. Would that be a satisfactory compromise?"
Dr Walter Cocx
Premier Commissioner
That sounds like a good compromise, yes.
Münevver Birdane
Internal Affairs Commissioner of the European Union
Very well, thank you for your constructive opinion. With this in mind, I propose the following sanctions package:
Economic Sanctions
Diplomatic Sanctions
Individual Sanctions
Dr Walter Cocx
Premier Commissioner
The deadline for this discussion now having expired, I will be presenting a Sanction Motion to the European Council forthwith.
Dr Walter Cocx
Premier Commissioner
Colleagues ( @Alkharya @Duxburian-Union ),
As you will have seen, more than four member states have lodged a Sanction Request against the Federation of Istkalen, which, especially given the current situation there, appears to me both timely and necessary. The next stage in the Sanctioning process is a five-day Commission discussion on what sanctions package to introduce to the Council, if any. For this, I require your input. I propose a highly similar Sanctions package to the one proposed for the UNSR, explicitly excluding food and nutritional resources from Sanctions, as stressed by Sarah Gladwell.
My proposal is thus:
Economic Sanctions
Diplomatic Sanctions
Individual Sanctions
I will close discussion on this Sanctions Package on 26th April, 9am BST
Premier Commissioner Dr Walter Cocx