THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE has decided to accept the petition of Petitioner (henceforth CLAIMANT) The Government of the Kingdom of Reitzmag filed against the Petitioned (henceforth DEFENDANT) The United Dominions of Icholasen, and open a case of Original Jurisdiction of the Court as defined in IV§II.II of the Constitution of the European Union.
At the direction of the Chief Justice, Justices VAJDA and RINDER will recuse themselves from this case as it represents a direct conflict of interest.
The CLAIMANT presents that the DEFENDANT, in the actions of Nicolezians in Copala City, is liable for damages to both the Kingdom of Reitzmag and its citizens. The CLAIMANT establishes this liability through §II.III & §II.IV.A-E of the Anti-Terrorism Act (2006).
The CLAIMANT, if such liability can be established under EU law, seeks compensation in cash for the total costs of damaged accrued in Copala City during the incidents defined.
Therefore, this Court, in accordance with the Constitution of the European Union and the European Court of Justice Case Procedures Act 2013, recognises the Standing of the CLAIMANT and hereby requires both parties to dutifully present or send representation to appear before this court.
The case Kingdom of Reitzmag v. United Dominions of Icholasen is now OPEN.
The CLAIMANT or representative thereof, the Government of the Kingdom of Reitzmag, shall deliver their opening statement first, followed by that of the DEFENDANT or representative thereof, the Government of the United Dominions of Icholasen.
Before delivering any statement to this court, please provide your name and relation to the respective party for the record.
The Solicitor representing the Kingdom of Reitzmag, if presenting to this Court at present, may begin by delivering their opening statement and summary of allegations.
Chief Justice of the ECoJ