Voting has now concluded. A total of 4 votes were cast. The votes are as follows:

To determine the European Court of Justice:

Round I
Christopher COLUMBO = 0
Mae LYNWOOD = 1
Christopher VAJDA = 1 - ELECTED
Marine MARCHAND = 1
Rob BONTA = 1

Coin toss determines that the first surplus to be allocated is Christopher VAJDA's.

Round II
Christopher COLUMBO = 0
Mae LYNWOOD = 1.33 - ELECTED
Marine MARCHAND = 1
Rob BONTA = 1

Round III
Christopher COLUMBO = 0
Marine MARCHAND = 1.4962406015037595 - ELECTED
Rob BONTA = 1.1637593984962407

Round IV
Christopher COLUMBO = 0.27402954622737746
Rob BONTA = 1.7159704537726226 - ELECTED

Round V
Christopher COLUMBO = 1.32 - ELECTED

To determine Chief Justice:

Round I:
Mae LYNWOOD = 1
Christopher VAJDA = 1
Marine MARCHAND = 1
Rob BONTA = 1

Coin toss determines that Christopher VAJDA is ELIMINATED.

Round II:
Mae LYNWOOD = 2
Marine MARCHAND = 1
Rob BONTA = 1

Coin toss determines that Rob BONTA is ELIMINATED.

Round III:
Mae LYNWOOD = 3
Marine MARCHAND = 1

Mae Lynwood is thus duly elected as Chief Justice of the European Court of Justice. Rob Bonta, Christopher Columbo, Christopher Vajda and Marine Marchand are also duly elected as Justices to the European Court of Justice. Congratulations to the new Euorpean Court of Justice.

alt text

Name: Rob Bonta
Nation: California
Incumbent?: Y
Background: https://nseuropeanunion.com/topic/1587/ecoj-nominations-june-2023/6

Voting has now concluded. A total of 5 votes were cast. The votes are as follows:

To determine the European Court of Justice:

Round I
Rob BONTA = 0
Christopher COLUMBO = 1
Luis López GUERRA = 2 - ELECTED
Alexios KALLAS = 1
Osoth LEAWINASTER = 1
Christopher VAJDA = 0

Round II
Rob BONTA = 0
Christopher COLUMBO = 1
Alexios KALLAS = 1.58 - ELECTED
Osoth LEAWINASTER = 1
Christopher VAJDA = 0.5800000000000001

Round III
Rob BONTA = 0
Christopher COLUMBO = 1.74 - ELECTED
Osoth LEAWINASTER = 1
Christopher VAJDA = 0.5800000000000001

Round IV
Rob BONTA = 0.14050632911392408
Osoth LEAWINASTER = 1.759493670886076 - ELECTED
Christopher VAJDA = 0.5800000000000001

Round V
Rob BONTA = 1.06 - ELECTED
Christopher VAJDA = 0.5800000000000001

To determine Chief Justice:

Round I
Christopher COLUMBO = 1
Luis López GUERRA = 2
Alexios KALLAS = 1
Osoth LEAWINASTER = 1

Coin toss determines that Alexios KALLAS is ELIMINATED.

Round II
Christopher COLUMBO = 1
Luis López GUERRA = 3
Osoth LEAWINASTER = 1

Luis López Guerra is thus duly elected as Chief Justice of the European Court of Justice. Rob Bonta, Christopher Columbo, Alexios Kallas and Osoth Leawinaster are also duly elected as Justices to the European Court of Justice. Congratulations to the new Euorpean Court of Justice.

alt text

Name: Rob Bonta
Incumbent?: No
Nation: California
Birthdate: September 22, 1972
Education:

Bachelor of Arts, Political Science, UCLA, 1994
Master Degree, Legal Studies, University of Oxford, 1996
UCLA Law School, 1998

Background:

Federal Prosecutor, 2000-2012
Member of the Federal Parliament, 2012-2022

The European Court of Justice has rejected this petition due to a lack of important information. Please resubmit this petition with the relevant legislation or parts of the constitution that the accused is violating, with relevant evidence. Feel free to consult our petition office for further help. Thank you.

Dayo Faith Mwangi
Chief Justice of the European Court of Justice

Voting has now concluded. There were a total of 4 votes cast. The votes were thus:

Betsy JOHNSON (Oregon): 4 votes (100%)

Betsy Johnson is thus duly elected to the European Court of Justice.

After much deliberation, the European Court of Justice has decided on the validity of the last European Commission elections.

It should be understood that while The Constitution of the European Union does not set a clear precedent for write-in candidates, it has set very clear boundaries on certain aspects of commission elections in Article III, Section II. I would like to quote Clause II from the aforementioned article:

The nomination period for each Office shall run for seven days, to be followed by a seven-day debate period, in turn, followed by a seven-day voting period.

Following the precedent established in previous court decisions, including one where an election was cancelled due to the debate period not being up to standards, The Court is concerned about the fact that both gentlemen, Kevin Cotilla and Jean-Claude Juncker, who were elected using write-in votes, could not participate in the seven-day debate period, as they did not nominate themselves in the seven-day nomination period.

Both of these periods are very clearly set by the Constitution, which is the paramount law of the European Union, and the European Court of Justice is responsible for ensuring that the political activities of the European Union are not conflicting with the Constitution, as mentioned in Article IV, Section II, Clause I:

The European Court of Justice is responsible for determining whether an Act or Amendment of the European Council is in line with the Constitution.

Therefore, The Court unanimously finds that:

A) Write-in notes can not be used in European elections, as they are incompatible with the precedents set by the Constitution,

B) The non-proper execution of the periods clearly set by the Constitution in the last elections is problematic.

Therefore, to ensure that these elections do not erode the validity of the succeeding elections made by the European Union as a whole, The European Court of Justice orders a new election under this legal understanding.

——

Dayo Faith Mwangi
Chief Justice of the European Court of Justice

Voting has now concluded. There were a total of 6 votes counted.

Due to the re-election of Jean Claude Juncker as Premier Commissioner, Carlos Lesmes Serrano of Spain has been disqualified from the ECoJ election. Since there are only 4 candidates for election, and there are 5 seats on the European Court of Justice, all candidates are thusly elected to the European Court of Justice. Congratulations to the new Justices. Due to Serrano’s disqualification, he will automatically not be counted on the first round of deciding a new Chief Justice.

To decide the Chief Justice:

Dayo Faith MWANGI (Elthize): 4 votes (~67%)
Benjamin STEYN (Inimicus): 2 votes (~33%)

Dayo Faith Mwangi is thus duly elected as Chief Justice of the European Court of Justice. A special election shall be held to fill the vacant seat.

alt text

Candidate Name: Sir Christopher Vajda, CMG
Home Nation: Reitzmag
Incumbent? (Y/N): No
Biography: Born 1955; law degree from Strathe University; called to the Bar of Reitzmag by Gray's Inn (1979); Barrister (1979-2012); King's Counsel (1997); Bencher of Gray's Inn (2003); Recorder of the Crown Court (2003-12); Treasurer of the Kingdom of Reitzmag Association for European Law (2001-12); Justice of the European Court of Justice (2021)

Judge Judy Sheindlin:By a margin of 4-0 the court finds in favour of the complainant. The court believes that in this case there is significant overreach in banning a whole group based on nationality and religion and that such an act is against the EU constitution protections on equal treatment and rights and in removing an entire group based on this it breaches the laws on forced removal against Population transfer, defined as the forcible movement, imposed by an authority, of a large group of people from one region to another, for reasons relating to innate characteristics of a group including: a group's culture, religion, sexual orientation, political beliefs or other protected statuses as outlined in the UDoHR. The court hearby orders that the government of Mennrimiak revoke the discriminatory law and only pursue deportations based on actions not a persons religion or nationality and in cases where this law has led to costs and losses to the individuals the state fully pays the costs caused to those affected by the discriminatory law in either lost earnings, lost deposits or exit fees for housing accommodation contract costs or costs of transport that resulted from the illegal deportations. On top of that the court requires all visas cancelled under the discriminatory law be reissued and the people be allowed to return to Mennrimiak.

Voting has now concluded. There were a total of 7 votes counted.

Since there were 5 candidates for election, and there are 5 seats on the European Court of Justice, all candidates were thusly elected to the European Court of Justice. Congratulations to the new Justices.

To decide the Chief Justice:

Round I
Judy SCHEINDLIN: 3
Dayo MWANGI: 2
Benjamin STEYN: 2
Robert FRENCH: 0 (Eliminated)
Raymond GAUTHIER: 0 (Eliminated)

Round II
Judy SCHEINDLIN: 3
Benjamin STEYN: 2
Dayo MWANGI: 2 (Eliminated)

Mwangi and Steyn tied with 2 votes. Since Steyn ranked higher than Mwangi on 4 of the 7 ballots, Mwangi was eliminated in the tiebreaker.

Round III
Judy SCHEINDLIN: 4
Benjamin STEYN: 3

Judy Scheindlin is thus duly elected as Chief Justice of the European Court of Justice.

The court's opinion and decision is Strathae is guilty of violating privacy and guilty of violating conscience. However, all other charges are not carried.

Chief Justice Robert French

alt text

Candidate name: Dayo Faith Mwangi
Incumbent: No
Biography: Dayo Mwangi worked as an on-and-off defence attorney in the 1970s, and briefly served as a judge in a St. Lucas federal court in 1980. She received a doctorate in law in 1986 and started serving as a judge in the Constitutional Court of Elthize two years later, which is the second-highest court in the country. She resigned from this position in 2015 as a protest after the Supreme Court approved some of the harsh sentences given during the 2012-14 corruption scandals, which she called "absurd and politically motivated". In 2016, she was elected as the president of the Forecoaster Bar Association. She left this office in 2021, in accordance with the term limits of the institution.

(photo credit)

European Court of Justice Park Yeon-mi v. Strathae

Note: the following judgement was prepared and drafted by the Court preceding the Court elections of March 2022, and received consent from the current Chief Justice to publish its findings.

Justices Concurring:

Benjamin STEYN Frans SVENSON Luis LOPEZ GUERRA Lygafaz ATHLABLOMAZEN

Justices Dissenting:
None

Justices Recused:
None

CLAIMANT: Park Yeon-mi
DEFENDANT: Government of Strathae

Chief Justice Steyn delivering the opinion of the court.

The Claimant presented that the policy introduced by the Defendant requiring citizens to provide uncompensated and compulsory labour are in violation of Article V.IV-i(UDoHR) of the Constitution, prohibiting slavery and servitude. The Claimant further presented a breach of Article V.XX-ii(UDoHR) of the Constitution, prescribing the right of all to have equal access to public service.

The Court recognises the cases made by both parties, and rules by unanimous decision in favour of the Claimant.

The Court concurs with the Claimant that the Community Duty Program violates freedom from servitude as defined in the Unversal Declaration of Human Rights. The Court finds especially concerning the presented evidence showing the Defendant's attempts to compel by force and on penalty of the removal of democratic rights the participation in the Community Duty Program.

The Court does not concur with the Claimant that the Community Duty Program violates the right to equal access to public service, and accepts the Defendant's argument that one may choose not to participate in the Program. Nevertheless, the Court recognises that choosing not to participate results in serious detrimental consequences for those involved -- this, then, constitutes a breach of servitude prohibitions.

The Claimant further presented evidence suggesting additional breaches of several sections of the Universal Declaration of Human rights. These breaches were not listed in the original petition filed by the Claimant and as such were not considered in the judgement of the Court.

The Court nevertheless emphasises to the Defendant the discriminatory and oppressive nature of the Community Duty Program. Forcing individuals to provide unpaid labour to benefit the Defendant, on pain of a removal of their democratic rights, fines, imprisonment, or a combination, is a highly serious breach of the freedoms prescribed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The Court therefore ORDERS the Defendant to CEASE the Community Duty Program with immediate effect. Any individuals currently enrolled in the Community Duty Program shall CEASE their unpaid work immediately without penalty or detriment, and no further individuals shall be enrolled in the Program at any time. The Court further ORDERS the Defendant to pay a fine of €20 000 000 for contempt of European Law.

The results are in, unfortunately, the votes from the Federal Republic of Lusitania and Vettonia could not be included in the final tally, as the country only ascended to the European Union after the nomination period had already began.

alt text

Thusly, Robert French of Australia is elected as Chief Justice of the European Court of Justice. Frans Svenson of Mennrimiak, Judy Scheindlin of the United Duchies, Sven Lorenzen of Vayinaod, and Sanne Bosmans of Ineland are elected as Associate Justices of the European Court of Justice.

Congratulations to all the elected officials, and commiserations to all other candidates.

Nominations are now closed. The candidates for the European Court of Justice are thus:

Lygafaz Athlablomazen (Ruthund) Sanne Bosmans (Ineland) Robert French (Australia) Sven Lorenzen (Vayinaod) Carlos Ronserlkart (Gania) Judy Scheindlin (United Duchies) Frans Svenson (Mennrimiak)

Voting will open once European Commission voting also begins.

Very well. The Court therefore declares the case of the Gertrude Echteran Children's Choir v Inimicus CLOSED.

Benjamin Steyn
Chief Justice