Amendment to the Nuclear Proliferation Act 2009
-
I propose the following
1.The ENAA shall consist of five members, four of which will be permanent members and one of which will be by majority vote of the council selected by the European Council every 12 months. This single elected member must be a non-nuclear state and will vacate their seat if they obtain nuclear weapons.
- The four
permanentmembers of the ENAA are as follows:
a. The Aelir of the Kendro-Laatzenian Dominions of the Duxburian Union
b.The Prime Minister of the Apostolic Kingdom of AngleterThe Emperor of Inimicus
c. The Archbishop of the Most Blessed State of Inquista
d. The Korojaunu of the United Dominions of Icholasen
3.The nations that will have representation on the ENAA should assign their most powerful political figure to the role.
- To ratify a vote within the ENAA, a majority of 51% or greater of the present voting members is required. For there to be a valid vote, a minimum quorum of three members must be obtained.
My only contention is with the word permanent. I think it creates an unnecessary lock on membership of aspiring states further cements the interests of a few states on matters which effect us all. Therefore I proposed that in amendment one that all states that apply should be elected via a majority vote of this council. Why not let democracy decide?
Izumi Miwako
Councilor of the Federal Republic of Yosai
- The four
-
I believe that if we are going to reform the ENAA's membership to keep it updated and in line with the current geopolitical situation I feel the most proper organization would be as follows:
Two permanent members:
- Aelir of the Kendro-Laatzenian Dominions of the Duxburian Union
- The Archbishop of the Most Blessed State of Inquista
Two elected members:
- One nuclear state
- One non-nuclear state
This would obviously create an even number of seats on the board necessitating super majorities but I feel this would if anything be beneficial to the institutions legitimacy. I would like to see how the chamber feels in general about the proposal before moving forward on drafting an amendment to that effect.
Now that is my proposal, let me go on to state why I feel the others brought forward for the most part do not function that well.
Inimicus I believe, especially its Emperor, would be a trustworthy member in the context of the ENAA. However, its geopolitical issues with a variety of members states would unfortunately just hamper the institutions legitimacy through constant attacks from those opposing member-states. It's nothing Inimicus did, its just the logical progression of what would happen if they were to rise up to the position.
Cllr. Roscoe is beyond wrong. Yosai is not capable of handling itself as a member of the ENAA, and would face similar bias issues as Inimicus. Not to mention including it as a permanent member would give non-nuclear states a majority which defeats the purpose of the ENAA.
It is a technical institution. Not a political one. It's job is to examine a state and evaluate whether it is truly trusthworthy of being handed nuclear weapons, and I do not believe they have made an outwardly bad choice thus far in its history. The states with the most technical expertise in whether a state can handle the needed security, technological handling, political restraint in dealing with these weapons of massive destruction are other nuclear states. They have that experience. No one else does. The purpose of the non-nuclear states on the ENAA is to give some legitimacy to the organisation, but it still needs to be a technical institution first and foremost.
Which is why making it a completely "democratic" body is short-sighted. It fails to recognize the purpose of the ENAA and turns it into the biased body that some Cllrs. are so against here of but yet do not mind the potential of making it a biased body if it benefits them.
Those are my thoughts on the subject.
Cllr. Carita Falk
Archrepublic of Vayinaod -
I do like this compromise by my colleague Carita Falk. At least there is a chance to not have a permanent majority on issues such as nuclear arsenals. Majorities will come and go, but at least there is not a permanent majority. And while we are flattered to be considered as a worthy candidate by our colleagues from the Duchies, I agree with Councillor Faik, we have no aspirations to join as members of the ENAA in any capacity at this time. What we want is balance and the amendment proposed by the Archrepublic of Vayinaod's representative is at the moment the bast solution to ensure that.
-
I fully support the compromise by the right honourable councillor Falk . I would endorse that as an amendment and also withdraw my proposed amendment.
James Mizrachi-Roscoe , Councillor for United Duchies
-
whatever.
Ed Miliband
-
Debate has ended. Three amendments were proposed, as follows:
AMENDMENT I
SECTION II. THE MAKEUP OF THE ENAA
...
2. The four permanent members of the ENAA are as follows:
a. The Aelir of the Kendro-Laatzenian Dominions of the Duxburian Union
b.The Prime Minister of the Apostolic Kingdom of AngleterThe Emperor of InimicusThe Federal Republic of Yosai
c. The Archbishop of the Most Blessed State of Inquista
d. The Korojaunu of the United Dominions of Icholasen
AMENDMENT II
SECTION II. THE MAKEUP OF THE ENAA
....
2. The four permanent members of the ENAA are as follows:
a. The Aelir of the Kendro-Laatzenian Dominions of the Duxburian Union
b.The Prime Minister of the Apostolic Kingdom of AngleterThe Emperor of Inimicus
c. The Archbishop of the Most Blessed State of Inquista
d.The Korojaunu of the United Dominions of IcholasenThe Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
AMENDMENT III
SECTION II. THE MAKEUP OF THE ENAA
1.The ENAA shall consist of five members, four of which will be permanent members and one of which will be by majority vote of the council selected by the European Council every 12 months. This single elected member must be a non-nuclear state and will vacate their seat if they obtain nuclear weapons.
- The four
permanentmembers of the ENAA are as follows:
a. The Aelir of the Kendro-Laatzenian Dominions of the Duxburian Union
b.The Prime Minister of the Apostolic Kingdom of AngleterThe Emperor of Inimicus
c. The Archbishop of the Most Blessed State of Inquista
d. The Korojaunu of the United Dominions of Icholasen
3.The nations that will have representation on the ENAA should assign their most powerful political figure to the role.
- To ratify a vote within the ENAA, a majority of 51% or greater of the present voting members is required. For there to be a valid vote, a minimum quorum of three members must be obtained.
Amendment I contradicts with Amendment II. Voting will begin NOW and will continue until 23:59 GMT on 12 January 2023.
iras Tilkanas
Council Speaker and Councillor for the Republic of Istkalen - The four
-
I vote FOR Amendment II and AGAINST Amendments I and III.
Donald Tusk
Councillor for Spain -
Representing The State of Elthize, I vote FOR the first and third amendment and ABSTAIN on voting for other amendments.
Liam Zachary
Councillor for The State of Elthize -
On behalf of the Archrepublic of Vayinaod, I vote AGAINST all amendments.
I'd like to also note to the Speaker that Cllr. Mizrachi-Roscoe withdrew their amendment, and if amendment voting is to be redone I would like to propose the following amendment if possible to be included. I understand this would be irregular but due to the holidays I hope this would be offered some consideration as it does stress some important updates to the act as the cited position of does not exist currently for that specific version of the Duxburian Union for example.
Amendment IV:
SECTION II. THE MAKEUP OF THE ENAA
-
The ENAA shall consist of
fivefour members,fourtwo of which will be permanent members andonetwo of which will be selected by the European Council every 12 months.This single elected member must be a non-nuclear state and will vacate their seat if they obtain nuclear weapons.**Of the two elected members, one shall be a non-nuclear state, while the other elected member must be a nuclear weapon-licensed state. ** -
The
fourtwo permanent members of the ENAA are as follows:
a.The Aelir of the Kendro-Laatzenian Dominions of the Duxburian UnionThe Head of Government of the Duxburian Union
b.The Prime Minister of the Apostolic Kingdom of AngleterThe Head of Government of Inquista
c. The Archbishop of the Most Blessed State of Inquista
d. The Korojaunu of the United Dominions of Icholasen -
The nations that will have representation on the ENAA should assign their most powerful political figure to the role.
-
To ratify a vote within the ENAA, a majority of 51% or greater of the present voting members is required. For there to be a valid vote, a minimum quorum of three members must be obtained.
-
-
The withdrawal of Cllr. Mizrachi-Roscoe's amendment is reason merely to render null votes for his amendment; however, it is the holiday season, as you say, it is probably a better idea to redo votes with your amendment included, Cllr. Falk. My apologies to all in advance.
Three amendments have been proposed, as follows:
AMENDMENT I
SECTION II. THE MAKEUP OF THE ENAA
....
2. The four permanent members of the ENAA are as follows:
a. The Aelir of the Kendro-Laatzenian Dominions of the Duxburian Union
b.The Prime Minister of the Apostolic Kingdom of AngleterThe Emperor of Inimicus
c. The Archbishop of the Most Blessed State of Inquista
d.The Korojaunu of the United Dominions of IcholasenThe Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
AMENDMENT II
SECTION II. THE MAKEUP OF THE ENAA
1.The ENAA shall consist of five members, four of which will be permanent members and one of which will be by majority vote of the council selected by the European Council every 12 months. This single elected member must be a non-nuclear state and will vacate their seat if they obtain nuclear weapons.
- The four
permanentmembers of the ENAA are as follows:
a. The Aelir of the Kendro-Laatzenian Dominions of the Duxburian Union
b.The Prime Minister of the Apostolic Kingdom of AngleterThe Emperor of Inimicus
c. The Archbishop of the Most Blessed State of Inquista
d. The Korojaunu of the United Dominions of Icholasen
3.The nations that will have representation on the ENAA should assign their most powerful political figure to the role.
- To ratify a vote within the ENAA, a majority of 51% or greater of the present voting members is required. For there to be a valid vote, a minimum quorum of three members must be obtained.
AMENDMENT III
SECTION II. THE MAKEUP OF THE ENAA
-
The ENAA shall consist of
fivefour members,fourtwo of which will be permanent members andonetwo of which will be selected by the European Council every 12 months.This single elected member must be a non-nuclear state and will vacate their seat if they obtain nuclear weapons.**Of the two elected members, one shall be a non-nuclear state, while the other elected member must be a nuclear weapon-licensed state. ** -
The
fourtwo permanent members of the ENAA are as follows:
a.The Aelir of the Kendro-Laatzenian Dominions of the Duxburian UnionThe Head of Government of the Duxburian Union
b.The Prime Minister of the Apostolic Kingdom of AngleterThe Head of Government of Inquista
c. The Archbishop of the Most Blessed State of Inquista
d. The Korojaunu of the United Dominions of Icholasen -
The nations that will have representation on the ENAA should assign their most powerful political figure to the role.
-
To ratify a vote within the ENAA, a majority of 51% or greater of the present voting members is required. For there to be a valid vote, a minimum quorum of three members must be obtained.
Voting will begin, again, now and continue until 12:00 GMT on 13 January 2023.
Iras Tilkanas
Council Speaker and Councillor for the Republic of Istkalen - The four
-
On behalf of the Archrepublic of Vayinaod, I vote AGAINST Amendments 1 and 2, and FOR Amendment 3.
Carita Falk
Archrepublic of Vayinaod -
I vote FOR Amendments I and III and AGAINST Amendment II.
Donald Tusk
Councillor for Spain
The Kingdom of Spain
His Majesty the King, Felipe VI
President Alberto Núñez-Feijóo
Councillor and Council Speaker Donald Tusk -
On behalf of United Duchies I vote Against amendments I and II and for Amendment III
James Mizrachi-Roscoe, Councillor for United Duchies -
On behalf of the United Kingdom, I vote for Amendment One.
Ed Miliband
-
On behalf of the Hellesthalassa Kingdom i vote AGAINST Amendments 1 and 2 and FOR Amendment 3
Kassandra Petrou
Councillor for Hellas -
On behalf of the Commonwealth of Leagio, I vote FOR Amendments 1 and III and AGAINST Amendment II.
Lionel Morel
EU Councilor for Leagio -
On behalf of Federal Republic of Yosai I vote Against amendments I and II and for Amendment III
Izumi Miwako
Councillor of the Federal Republic of Yosai. -
Representing The State of Elthize, I vote FOR the third amendment and ABSTAIN on voting for other amendments.
Liam Zachary
Councillor for The State of Elthize -
Duxburian sentiment is split, so on behalf of the Union of Duxburian Dominions, I vote FOR Amendments I and III regardless of their contradictory nature, and against Amendment II.
Wesley Greene
Councillor-General of the Duxburian Union -
The Kingdom of Reitzmag's Assembly for the European Council has decided through a vote with the presence of all members as follows:
Question: Support Amendment I in the Amendment to the Nuclear Proliferation Act of 2009
Ayes - 0
Noes - 11
Abtentions - 0The Noes have it. The Noes have it.
Question: Support Amendment II in the Amendment to the Nuclear Proliferation Act of 2009
Ayes - 0
Noes - 11
Abtentions - 0The Noes have it. The Noes have it.
Question: Support Amendment III in the Amendment to the Nuclear Proliferation Act of 2009
Ayes - 7
Noes - 0
Abtentions - 4The Ayes have it. The Ayes have it.
Therefore, the Kingdom of Reitzmag votes FOR Amendment III and AGAINST Amendment I and Amendment II.
Dame Yuridiana Yahontov GCC
Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag
