NS European Union

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Discord

    Amendment to European-budget-act-2012

    European Council
    7
    12
    404
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Inquista
      Inquista last edited by

      No.

      Bp. Karinn Lallana
      Councillor for Inquista

      siggy.png The Most Blessed State of Inquista
      Archbishop Mikaela Kligenberg
      Chief Bishop Secretary Edward Firoux
      Councillor Karinn Lallana

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • Vayinaod
        Vayinaod EU last edited by

        I do not believe this amendment is needed, this is a non-issue and will just seek to overcomplicate a fairly simple system. If the Councillor has an issue with a surplus he should propose an amendment to lower the contribution level.

        Cllr. Lallana put it simply, "no".

        Carita Falk
        Councilor for Vayinaod

        Arch-Konsul: Kristian Nylund (Greens)
        Ruling Coalition: Greens, Moderates
        EU Councillor : Carita Falk (Greens-Independent)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • BrumBrum
          BrumBrum Commission last edited by

          In light of what has been said I am proposing an ammendment to the ammendment :

          c.Revenues shall exceed expenses in a budget by no more than 10% with contributions by nations reduced accordingly according to projected budget. Contributions shall be readjusted and recalculated if a budget is projected to have revenues exceed expenses by more than 10%.

          This would remove the more complex rule and simply make this act lower the contribution to a level far more in line with projected expenses.

          James Mizrachi-Roscoe , Counillour for United Duchies

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Spain
            Spain last edited by

            For the first time in a while, I have to agree with the simple but clear statement from Councillor Lallana. And also note, Councillor Mizrachi-Roscoue, that this amendment will be completely stupid after you amended the part of the text that regulated the revenues total amount, so you are now making member states contribute even more to the European Union, from a 0.001% to a 0.033%.

            If you are against a huge revenue, then this amendment will just make it higher as it now stands. Pointless, to be clear.

            Donald Tusk
            Deputy Speaker and Councillor for Spain

            The Kingdom of Spain
            His Majesty the King, Felipe VI
            President Alberto Núñez-Feijóo
            Councillor and Council Speaker Donald Tusk

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • M
              Montenbourg EU last edited by

              As said by our friend from Vayanoid, If the Councillor has an issue with a surplus he should propose an amendment to lower the contribution level.

              Emma Granger,
              Councillor for Montenbourg

              🇩🇰 The Kingdom of Montenbourg
              👑HM Victoria the First, Queen of Montenbourg
              🏛️PM Rt. Hon. Birgitte Nyborg
              🌟 Councillor Emma Granger.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Istkalen
                Istkalen EU last edited by

                I oppose this amendment. Contribution levels should not be decreased to any more than 0.05 percent; that about the balancing of the budget is simply overcomplicated.

                Iras Tilkanas
                Councillor for the Republic of Istkalen

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • BrumBrum
                  BrumBrum Commission last edited by

                  I would like to point out the amendment proposed to remove that section is on the table so if you vote for that and it passes then that issue is solved. And as for the maths I know it can be difficult in the chamber when debating quickly but 1 tenth of 1 percent is 0.1% . I believe 0.033% is lower than that though its understandable for such a mistake to get made.

                  James Mizrachi-Roscoe, Councillour for United Duchies

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Spain
                    Spain last edited by

                    Yeah you are right Cllr. Mizrachi-Roscoe, my fault. The proposed amount is lower than the current one. My apologies.

                    Donald Tusk
                    Deputy Speaker and Councillor for Spain

                    The Kingdom of Spain
                    His Majesty the King, Felipe VI
                    President Alberto Núñez-Feijóo
                    Councillor and Council Speaker Donald Tusk

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • BrumBrum
                      BrumBrum Commission last edited by

                      I would like to please withdraw this to present it again with the changes needed.

                      James Mizrachi-Roscoe

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Fremet
                        Fremet EU last edited by

                        The bill has been withdrawn, per the request of the sponsor.

                        Charles Michel
                        Council Speaker

                        Statsminister Erna Solberg
                        EU Cllr Charles Michel
                        #FortressFremet

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Our forums are maintained by volunteers. Consider donating to help us cover our monthly expenses and keep everything up and running Donate