Amendment to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Article V of the Constitution
-
Cllr. Shakur, the UDoHR already restricts voting rights to citizens - it states that people only have the right to take part in the governance of their own countries. As such, I do not know, nor do I understand, how any of this would lead to a 'Europe led and dominated by Reitzmag.'
That takes me to my second point.
Cllr. Shakur, never has the Constitution been interpreted in the way that you claim it will be interpreted if this amendment passes. If it were so, then technically it would already be illegal to restrict voting and property to just citizens. However, it has been interpreted in a similar way to what I have previously stated; to defend the murders of many.
What is more important, outlandish hypotheticals or reality?
That is not to say that there should be further reform to ensure a more rational interpretation of the UDoHR in the future; however, that is out of the purview of this proposed amendment.
Martin Bourgaize
Councillor for the People's Confederation of Eastern Haane -
I second what Councillor Bourgaize has had to say, and I would like to know which specific sections of the UDoHR does Councillor Shakur have reservations about extending to all people within the boundaries of the EU?
I've done a second scan through the UDoHR and I personally see no reasons to extend these to every individual located in the EU's boundaries. There is only one section which I could imagine as being perhaps somewhat questionable, which is Section XIII, Freedom of Movement. Section XIII says every person has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state. However, just having the right to the freedom of movement doesn't mean that people can move totally freely within the EU, they simply have a right to legally cross borders, if and where they can, with the legal documentation such visas, if necessary, for instance. This is already something that is afforded to every single European, so I'm not sure why it shouldn't be a right for every person located within the EU's jurisdiction.
I would just like some more specific clarity on your objections, Councillor Shakur.
Edward Firoux
Council Speaker and Councillor for Inquista -
May we begin counting the votes?
Martin Bourgaize
Councillor for the People's Confederation of Eastern Haane -
Yes, apologies. Final voting on this constitutional amendment begins NOW and will last until 20:15 GMT on July 3rd, 2020.
On behalf of the Most Blessed State of Inquista, I vote FOR this constitutional amendment.
Edward Firoux
Council Speaker and Councillor for Inquista -
On behalf of the Republic Nofoaga I vote FOR this ammendment.
Mrs. Azaya Dubecq
EU Councilor for Nofoaga -
The Sublime Ottoman State votes FOR this admendment.
Mr. Su Tefvik
European Councillor, Court of Osman -
On behalf of the People's Confederation of Eastern Haane, I vote FOR this amendment.
Martin Bourgaize
Councillor for the People's Confederation of Eastern Haane -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Fremet, I vote FOR this amendment to the UDoHR.
Charles Michel
Councillor for the Kingdom of Fremet -
On behalf of the United Dominions of Icholasen, I vote FOR this amendment.
- Councillor (Duchess) Poppy Carlton-Romanov
-
On behalf of the Archrepublic of Vayinaod, I vote FOR this amendment.
Carita Falk
Cllr. for the Archrepublic of Vayinaod -
On behalf of the Democratic Republic of Czech Slavia, I vote FOR this amendment .
Václav Kohout
Councillor for Czech Slavia -
On behalf of the Commonwealth of Leagio, I vote FOR this amendment to the UDoHR.
Francis Plessis
EU Councilor for the Commonwealth of Leagio -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Spain, I vote FOR this amendment.
Donald D. Tusk
Councillor for Spain -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Reitzmag, I vote FOR this amendment.
Friedrich van Allen
Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag -
With 11 votes for, this amendment to the UDoHR has PASSED.
Edward Firoux
Council Speaker and Councillor for Inquista
The Kingdom of Spain
