22 Mar 2022, 23:52

I'd like to thank the Premier Commissioner for his extensive work on this bill.

Although I do find this act filled with some unnecessary provisions, I oppose the proposal to remove the article detailing rules on the distinctive emblems. I must say that, I think it is important that medical personnel be easily identifiable for their protection against attack from any side of a conflict. I also, highly oppose the complete removal of Article 6 for it states specific rules for medical transport and how they must be treated. Otherwise, I believe that this act would barely have any soul or purpose at all. But looking at the entire act, I think it would be more appropriate to amend each article instead of remove the articles as a whole. There are various sections that are necessary which will be removed if this wanton article removal will be done. An example of which is Article 1 Section 5, which states a brief summary of the minimum provisions that must be undertaken by parties in case of conflict. Without provisions like this, the primary purpose of this act will be gone. But at worst, nations may find loopholes to circumvent the provisions of this act and commit war crimes without being prosecuted. It is expected that we will be proposing our amendments later once the AEC has finished voted on the amendments proposed by our members, that is all I can say for now thank you.

Dame Yuridiana Yahontov GCC
Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag