Edward Firoux European Order of Merit Act
-
James Mizrachi Roscoe "I would like to take this time to honour Edward Firoux . This order of merit would be well deserved . Edward Firoux is a legend and I appreciate all he has done for equality especially on the rights of neurodivergent and disabled through the European Neurodivergent and Disablility Rights Act which he co-authored with myself , without his support and input we would not have passed the act and the neurodivergent and disabled population of Europe would be in a much weaker position affect people such as my sons. It is only right a fighter for equality and civil rights is honoured in such a way."
-
The debate has ended. Voting starts NOW and ends 8 April 2021 at 13h00 GMT.
I vote FOR this act.
Charles Michel
Council Speaker and Councilor for Fremet -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Spain, I vote FOR this Act.
Donald Tusk
Deputy Speaker and Councillor for Spain -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Montenbourg, I vote FOR this Act.
Emma Granger
Councillor for Montenbourg -
On behalf of United Duchies I vote for this act
James Mizrachi-Roscoe, Councillour of United Duchies -
On behalf of the Republic of Nofoaga, I vote FOR this act.
Mrs. Paul-Gabrielle Muzhare
EU Councillor for the Republic of Nofoaga -
The Empire of Inimicus votes FOR this Act.
Interim Cllr Nicholas Benfield -
Pravoslaviya votes AGAINST this Act. Firoux should be in prison, the only award he should be winning is a European Order of DEMERIT for murdering Paul Craticus!
Cllr Dragan Trympov
-
On behalf of the Alkharyan Republic, I vote AGAINST this act.
Metin Fazlı
European Councillor of the Alkharyan Republic -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Reitzmag, I vote AGAINST this act.
Yuridiana Yahontov
Interim Deputy Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag -
I believe Former Speaker Edward Firoux is too controversial of a figure for the European Council to give an honor at this time. As such, I must vote AGAINST this act.
Tony Odhinazen
EU Councilor, Ruthund -
Final voting on the Edward Firoux European Order of Merit Act has CLOSED.
With 6 votes for, 4 votes against, and no abstentions, the act has FAILED to meet the required supermajority of votes (75% of those present) required for passage.
Charles Michel
Council Speaker and Councilor Fremet