NS European Union

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Discord

    Amendment to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Article V of the Constitution

    European Council
    12
    20
    877
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Inquista
      Inquista last edited by

      Debate on this constitutional amendment starts NOW and will last until 21:25 GMT on June 25th, 2020.

      I fully support this proposal by Councillor Bourgaize.

      Edward Firoux
      Council Speaker and Councillor for Inquista

      siggy.png The Most Blessed State of Inquista
      Archbishop Mikaela Kligenberg
      Chief Bishop Secretary Edward Firoux
      Councillor Karinn Lallana

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        Pravoslaviya EU last edited by

        Cllr Tupac Shakur stood to speak

        I agree there is some need to revisit the UDoHR. Some of the language is clunky and imprecise, and the very concept of 'citizen of the European Union' doesn't exist anywhere in EU law. I'd like it to be reworded to something along the lines of 'every citizen of every member state of the European Union', to clarify its meaning.

        I oppose this amendment because there are certain things in the UDoHR which are clearly universal rights, like freedom from slavery, and some where it's reasonable for governments to make a distinction between citizens and non-citizens. The right to equal protection under the law alone would eliminate any such distinction if it were applied to everybody, and it's arguable now that a country cannot make such a distinction between its own citizens and citizens of other member states.

        It's reasonable for a country to restrict voting rights to citizens. To restrict non-citizens from buying too much property, and, for example, to reserve the right to restrict their access to that property as part of economic sanctions. To restrict state education funding for non-citizens. And a whole host of things that aren't explicitly stated in the UDoHR, but would be affected by the equal protection clause.

        I agree the UDoHR needs reform, but please, not this reform.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Kingdom of Reitzmag
          Kingdom of Reitzmag Eurocorps last edited by Kingdom of Reitzmag

          alt text

          I fully support this proposal from Coun. Bourgaize. I truly believe that human rights must be a priority of our legislation and that I believe that this motion would further protect the interests of the people.

          Now with Coun. Shakur, I strongly disagree with your proposals. First of all, you want to strip our European peoples the best example of exercising democratic process which takes the form of elections. Tell me Coun. Shakur, are you a fascist? Are you afraid of not being elected as European councilor for your country? |Then you also want to restrict people from buying too much property and restrict state education funding for non-citizens. Coun. Shakur, I want to tell you that with the latest statistics. The literacy rate of many European member-states are decreasing and this would affect heavily the economic growth of the member-states and Europe as one. Employment rates would fall if you do that Coun. Shakur.

          Think of your children and their future. We have to protect them and not remove them the rights to these benefits.

          Lastly, I'd like to say these words;

          The youth are the hope of the motherland!
          

          That's all, thank you very much.

          Friedrich van Allen
          Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag

          alt text

          HM King George
          Monarch

          Sir Simon Bridges GCB KCMG GCT MP
          Prime Minister

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            Pravoslaviya EU last edited by Pravoslaviya

            Van Halen, you cannot make up fake stats on the spot. Our literacy rate in Pravoslaviya is fine. If our region is becoming illiterate, it's the first I've heard of it. Maybe it's just Reitzmag?

            And don't call me a fascist, Van Halen. You are the single biggest hypocrite. If I was worried about being elected to the Council, then I'd call an election with a day's notice and no debates, and run the election myself to make super-sure I didn't lose. Oh, and I wouldn't decide the winner based on popular vote. Not only that, but I wouldn't release the popular vote results. Take three days to count the votes as well, just to be sure. That'd be a really fascist way of going about things.

            You shouldn't even be here, Van Halen. Maybe Nigel Farage should be in your place?

            Reitzmag has this crazy election system and yet its councillor is calling me a fascist for saying that Pravoslaviyan elections should be for Pravoslaviyan citizens. Truth is, Van Halen doesn't believe in citizenship and he doesn't believe in nations. He only wants this amendment because it would further his goal of merging all our countries into one, presumably one where he's in charge of the elections, and we have no time to campaign or debate, but he gets loads of time to count the votes. I wonder who'd win?

            If we don't want a Europe led and dominated by Reitzmag, then we have to vote against this amendment.

            Cllr Tupac Shakur

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • ?
              A Former User last edited by

              Cllr. Shakur, the UDoHR already restricts voting rights to citizens - it states that people only have the right to take part in the governance of their own countries. As such, I do not know, nor do I understand, how any of this would lead to a 'Europe led and dominated by Reitzmag.'

              That takes me to my second point.

              Cllr. Shakur, never has the Constitution been interpreted in the way that you claim it will be interpreted if this amendment passes. If it were so, then technically it would already be illegal to restrict voting and property to just citizens. However, it has been interpreted in a similar way to what I have previously stated; to defend the murders of many.

              What is more important, outlandish hypotheticals or reality?

              That is not to say that there should be further reform to ensure a more rational interpretation of the UDoHR in the future; however, that is out of the purview of this proposed amendment.

              Martin Bourgaize
              Councillor for the People's Confederation of Eastern Haane

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Inquista
                Inquista last edited by Inquista

                I second what Councillor Bourgaize has had to say, and I would like to know which specific sections of the UDoHR does Councillor Shakur have reservations about extending to all people within the boundaries of the EU?

                I've done a second scan through the UDoHR and I personally see no reasons to extend these to every individual located in the EU's boundaries. There is only one section which I could imagine as being perhaps somewhat questionable, which is Section XIII, Freedom of Movement. Section XIII says every person has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state. However, just having the right to the freedom of movement doesn't mean that people can move totally freely within the EU, they simply have a right to legally cross borders, if and where they can, with the legal documentation such visas, if necessary, for instance. This is already something that is afforded to every single European, so I'm not sure why it shouldn't be a right for every person located within the EU's jurisdiction.

                I would just like some more specific clarity on your objections, Councillor Shakur.

                Edward Firoux
                Council Speaker and Councillor for Inquista

                siggy.png The Most Blessed State of Inquista
                Archbishop Mikaela Kligenberg
                Chief Bishop Secretary Edward Firoux
                Councillor Karinn Lallana

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User last edited by

                  May we begin counting the votes?

                  Martin Bourgaize
                  Councillor for the People's Confederation of Eastern Haane

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Inquista
                    Inquista last edited by Inquista

                    Yes, apologies. Final voting on this constitutional amendment begins NOW and will last until 20:15 GMT on July 3rd, 2020.

                    On behalf of the Most Blessed State of Inquista, I vote FOR this constitutional amendment.

                    Edward Firoux
                    Council Speaker and Councillor for Inquista

                    siggy.png The Most Blessed State of Inquista
                    Archbishop Mikaela Kligenberg
                    Chief Bishop Secretary Edward Firoux
                    Councillor Karinn Lallana

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Nofoaga
                      Nofoaga EU last edited by

                      On behalf of the Republic Nofoaga I vote FOR this ammendment.

                      Mrs. Azaya Dubecq
                      EU Councilor for Nofoaga

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Fayrrendel
                        Fayrrendel EU last edited by Fayrrendel

                        The Sublime Ottoman State votes FOR this admendment.

                        Mr. Su Tefvik
                        European Councillor, Court of Osman

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          A Former User last edited by

                          On behalf of the People's Confederation of Eastern Haane, I vote FOR this amendment.

                          Martin Bourgaize
                          Councillor for the People's Confederation of Eastern Haane

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Fremet
                            Fremet EU last edited by

                            On behalf of the Kingdom of Fremet, I vote FOR this amendment to the UDoHR.

                            Charles Michel
                            Councillor for the Kingdom of Fremet

                            Statsminister Erna Solberg
                            EU Cllr Charles Michel
                            #FortressFremet

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Icholasen
                              Icholasen EU last edited by Icholasen

                              On behalf of the United Dominions of Icholasen, I vote FOR this amendment.


                              • Councillor (Duchess) Poppy Carlton-Romanov

                              The Union of Nicoleizian Socialist Republics
                              Chairman of the Communist Party: Michul Jirluchuz ☭
                              EU Councillor: Poppy Carlton-Romanov (EPA)
                              Korojaunu in Exile: Eilidh Whiteford ☆
                              Monarch in Exile: Queen Anastasia II ♚

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Vayinaod
                                Vayinaod EU last edited by

                                On behalf of the Archrepublic of Vayinaod, I vote FOR this amendment.

                                Carita Falk
                                Cllr. for the Archrepublic of Vayinaod

                                Arch-Konsul: Kristian Nylund (Greens)
                                Ruling Coalition: Greens, Moderates
                                EU Councillor : Carita Falk (Greens-Independent)

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C
                                  Czech Slavia EU last edited by

                                  On behalf of the Democratic Republic of Czech Slavia, I vote FOR this amendment .

                                  Václav Kohout
                                  Councillor for Czech Slavia

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Leagio
                                    Leagio ECoJ last edited by

                                    On behalf of the Commonwealth of Leagio, I vote FOR this amendment to the UDoHR.

                                    Francis Plessis
                                    EU Councilor for the Commonwealth of Leagio

                                    President of the Commonwealth: Ran Mouri-Kudo (Progressive Alliance Party)
                                    Governor-General of the Commonwealth: Magic Kaito (Leagioan Pact of Democracy)
                                    EU Councilor for Leagio: Francis Plessis (CPP/ EDLR)

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Spain
                                      Spain last edited by

                                      On behalf of the Kingdom of Spain, I vote FOR this amendment.

                                      Donald D. Tusk
                                      Councillor for Spain

                                      The Kingdom of Spain
                                      His Majesty the King, Felipe VI
                                      President Alberto Núñez-Feijóo
                                      Councillor and Council Speaker Donald Tusk

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Kingdom of Reitzmag
                                        Kingdom of Reitzmag Eurocorps last edited by

                                        On behalf of the Kingdom of Reitzmag, I vote FOR this amendment.

                                        Friedrich van Allen
                                        Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag

                                        alt text

                                        HM King George
                                        Monarch

                                        Sir Simon Bridges GCB KCMG GCT MP
                                        Prime Minister

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Inquista
                                          Inquista last edited by

                                          With 11 votes for, this amendment to the UDoHR has PASSED.

                                          Edward Firoux
                                          Council Speaker and Councillor for Inquista

                                          siggy.png The Most Blessed State of Inquista
                                          Archbishop Mikaela Kligenberg
                                          Chief Bishop Secretary Edward Firoux
                                          Councillor Karinn Lallana

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Our forums are maintained by volunteers. Consider donating to help us cover our monthly expenses and keep everything up and running Donate