REPEAL the Condemnation of the Coup in Icholasen Act II.
-
The UNSR is capitalist, and according to the government I represent, the so-called 'Free Icholasen' is illegitimate.
I do not wish to support illegitimate capitalist governments. The only reason why I have given my support to this act is because I believe it may cause a revolution in Icholasen - a democratic revolution - that will bring socialism and eventually communism to it.
Martin Bourgaize
Councillor for the People's Confederation of Eastern Haane -
My colleague from Eastern Haane has captured the essence of the act. The Coup in Icholasen was just that— a coup. Pretending that elections perpetuated by a domineering and totalist one-party state are legitimate is not only naive, but negligent in our duty to uphold the rule of law and the will of the people on this Council. The Nicoleizians are not suffering from Communism or any one ideology, they are suffering from a corrupt and dictatorial regime that seized power through force and transferred the reigns of government from a group elected by the masses to one insular unto themselves, that mocks the free nations of Europe by giving its citizens—and outsiders— an illusion of choice.
Fremet has seen this before. In the last revolution, the UNSR invaded my homeland and slaughtered millions of men, women, and children and laid waste to our island. This was the deed of evil men, drunk on power, seeking to subjugate the masses to further their own self-serving agenda. Those who have seized control in Icholasen in these recent months are not there for the benefits of the workers, carrying forth the torch of the people. Rather, they are a band of thugs that are willing to do whatever it takes to remain in power. The people of Icholasen, the government of Free Icholasen, and all those trapped in between are victims of a regime that lacks accountability, legitimacy, and a moral compass.
They must be opposed with all the means available to us if we are to ensure the freedom of all Europeans.
Charles Michel
Councillor for the Kingdom of Fremet -
"I am blatantly against this. This is much like the age old four attempts to get rid of the Cannabis Act. It is not happening."
-
The debate period has now come to an end. Final voting begins NOW and will last until 06:30 GMT on August 8th, 2020.
On behalf of the Most Blessed State of Inquista, I vote AGAINST this repeal.
Edward Firoux
Council Speaker and Councillor for Inquista -
I vote AGAINST this motion.
Friedrich van Allen
Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag -
For the Republic of Nofoaga, I vote AGAINST this repeal.
Mrs. Azaya Dubecq
EU Councilor for the Republic of Nofoaga -
On behalf of the Democratic Republic of Czech Slavia, I vote FOR this motion.
Václav Kohout
Councillor for Czech Slavia -
"On behalf of the Empire of Inimicus, I vote AGAINST this motion."
Sir Augustus Barrington
Empire of Inimicus -
I vote AGAINST this repeal.
Duchess Poppy Carlton-Romanov
Councillor for the United Dominions of Icholasen -
On behalf of the Commonwealth of Leagio, I vote AGAINST this repeal.
Francis Plessis
EU Councilor for Leagio -
On behalf of the United Kingdoms of Mennrimiak i Vote FOR this Repeal
Adam Karlssen
EU councillor for Mennrimiak -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Spain, I vote AGAINST this repeal.
Donald D. Tusk
Councillor for Spain -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Fremet, I vote AGAINST this repeal.
Charles Michel
Councillor for the Kingdom of Fremet -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Pravoslaviya, I vote FOR this repeal.
Cllr Tupac Shakur
-
On behalf of the Archrepublic of Vayinaod, I vote AGAINST this repeal.
Carita Falk
Archrepublic of Vayinaod -
On behalf of The Kingdom of Montenbourg, We vote AGAINST this repeal.
Dame Emma Granger
Councillor, Kingdom of Montenbourg -
With 3 votes for and 11 votes against, this repeal has been REJECTED.
Edward Firoux
Council Speaker and Councillor for Inquista
The Kingdom of Spain