Amendment to the Nuclear Proliferation Act of 2009
-
With the permission of the Speaker, I suggest we now move to voting on Amendments.
Amendment I, proposed by Cllr Tusk of Spain:
SECTION 2:
d.The Korojaunu of the United Dominions of Icholasen The Archkonsul of the Archrepublic of VayinaodThe Emperor of Inimicus
Amendment II, proposed by Cllr Mizrachi-Roscoe of the United Duchies:
SECTION 2:
d.The Korojaunu of the United Dominions of Icholasen The Archkonsul of the Archrepublic of VayinaodThe Federation of Fremet
Amendment III, proposed by Cllr Lallana of Inquista:
SECTION 2:
d.The Korojaunu of the United Dominions of Icholasen The Archkonsul of the Archrepublic of VayinaodThe Korojaunu of the Union of Nicoleizian Socialist Republics
Amendment IV, proposed by Speaker Tilkanas of Istkalen:
SECTION 2:
d. The Korojaunu of the United Dominions of Icholasen or a successor state, or in the case of the vacancy or contention of that role, whether in the United Dominions of Icholasen or in a successor state, the Emperor of the Empire of Inimicus.
Amendment V, proposed by Cllr Kohout of Czech Slavia:
SECTION 2:-
The ENAA shall consist of five members, four of which will be permanent members and one three of which will be permanent members and two of which will be selected by the European Council every 12 months. This single elected member must be a non-nuclear state and will vacate their seat if they obtain nuclear weapons. All member states will be represented by their Head of Government
-
The four permanent members of the ENAA are as follows:
a. The Duxburian Union
b. Angleter
c. Inquista
d. Icholasen
Please note, colleagues, that all of these amendments are exclusionary. In other words, one cannot vote in favour of multiple Amendments in this case without obfuscating the purpose of the legislation. Voting on Amendments starts NOW and ends 27 FEBRUARY AT 5PM GMT.
The Empire of Inimicus votes FOR Amendment I and AGAINST all other Amendments.
Nicholas Benfield
Deputy Speaker -
-
I vote FOR Amendment IV and AGAINST all other Amendments
Tony Odhinazen
EU Councilor, Ruthund -
I vote FOR amendment I and AGAINST all other amendments.
Donald Tusk
Councillor for Spain
The Kingdom of Spain
His Majesty the King, Felipe VI
President Alberto Núñez-Feijóo
Councillor and Council Speaker Donald Tusk -
On behalf of United Duchies I vote FOR Amendment II and AGAINST all other amendments
Councillor for United Duchies , James Mizrachi-Roscoe
-
On behalf of the Archrepublic of Vayinaod, I, Carita Falk, vote as follows:
FOR Amendment I
FOR Amendment IV
AGAINST All other amendmentsCarita Falk
Cllr. for the Archrepublic of Vayinaod -
ON BEHALF OF GANIA WE VOTE IN FAVOR OF AMENDMENT 1 AND AGAINST THE OTHERS
PEDRO BORDABERRY
GANIA COUNCILOR -
On behalf of the Union of Duxburian Dominions, I vote FOR Amendment I and against all others.
Wesley Greene
Councillor of the Duxburian Union -
I vote FOR Amendments III and IV, and AGAINST all other amendments.
Bp. Karinn Lallana
Councillor for Inquista -
On behalf of the Democratic Republic of Czech Slavia, I vote FOR Amendments IV and V, and ABSTAIN on all the other amendments
Václav Kohout
Councillor for Czech Slavia -
On behalf of the Federal Republic of Australia, I vote FOR the amendment.
-
Voting is extended until 00:00 GMT on 2 March 2022.
On behalf of the Republic of Istkalen, I vote FOR amendments IV and V, and AGAINST all others.
Iras Tilkanas
Council Speaker and Councillor for the Republic of Istkalen -
The Kingdom of Reitzmag's Assembly for the European Council has decided through a vote with the presence of all members as follows:
AMENDMENT AYE NO ABSTAIN STATUS 1. Emperor of Inimicus by the Councilor for Spain 0 11 0 FAIL 2. Federation of Fremet by the Councilor for the United Duchies 3 6 1 FAIL 3. Korojaunu of the UNSR by the Councilor for Inquista 4 3 2 FAIL 4. Successor state of the United Dominions of Icholasen and the Emperor of Inimicus by the Speaker of the EU Council, the Councilor for Istkalen 7 3 1 PASS 5. Reword by the Councilor for Czech Slavia 5 6 0 FAIL Therefore, the Kingdom of Reitzmag votes FOR Amendment IV and AGAINST all other amendments.
Dame Yuridiana Yahontov GCC
Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag -
On behalf of the Commonwealth of Leagio, I vote FOR Amendment V & I and I vote AGAINST all other amendments.
Lionel Morel
EU Councilor for Leagio -
On behalf of the United Principalities of Ineland, I vote FOR Amendment I and AGAINST all other amendments.
Charles Évere-Dancourt
HRM Prince of Linthout
Councillor for Ineland -
With seven votes for, five against, and one abstaining, amendment 1 has passed.
With one vote for, eleven against, and one abstaining, amendment 2 has failed.
With one vote for, eleven against, and one abstaining, amendment 3 has failed.
With four votes for and nine votes against, amendment 4 has failed.
With three votes for and ten votes against, amendment 5 has failed.
The proposal has been updated according to the passed amendment. VOTING begins now and will continue until 23:59 GMT on 11 March 2022.
On behalf of the Republic of Istkalen, I vote AGAINST this amendment.
Iras Tilkanas
Council Speaker and Councillor for the Republic of Istkalen -
On behalf of the Most Blessed State of Inquista, I vote AGAINST this amendment.
Bp. Karinn Lallana
Councillor for Inquista -
On behalf of the Union of Duxburian Dominions, I vote FOR the amendment.
Wesley Greene
Councillor of the Duxburian Union -
The Kingdom of Reitzmag's Assembly for the European Council has voted with all members present on a motion by the Deputy Councilor for New Moreland on this amendment:
Question: Withdraw the Amendment from consideration of the European Council?
Ayes - 9
Noes - 0
Abstentions - 2Therefore, the Kingdom of Reitzmag officially requests to withdraw this amendment from consideration of the European Council and requests the Speaker to close the procedures for this specific bill.
Dame Yuridiana Yahontov GCC
Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag -
This amendment is hereby withdrawn from consideration.
Iras Tilkanas
Council Speaker and Councillor for the Republic of Istkalen -
With your leave, Madam Speaker, I want to speak out against the tactics Cllr Yahontov has once again demonstrated in this Chamber today. She makes a valid proposal which Councillors from across the chamber discussed in earnest, proposed decent amendments on, and voted democratically on whether to accept these. And now, when the outcome no longer suits Cllr Yahontov's political purpose, she blocks the wishes of a plurality of representatives here by withdrawing her proposal outright.
This is not only disgraceful, it is undemocratic and below the standards we can expect from any Councillor in this place. It is childish, it is unacceptable. Simply because her Amendment was changed by a majority-decision of councillors does not mean Cllr Yahontov should throw her toys out of her proverbial pram. Stop this madness.
Working with other decent councillors in this chamber I intend to re-file this Amendment to the Council, with the wording the Council accepted it should have, and I would call upon all councillors here to stand against the teenage tactics of Cllr Yahontov.
Nicholas Benfield
Deputy Speaker
