Petition Office
-
Petitioner(s): Charles Michel, Speaker of the European Council
Petitionee(s): the Union of Syndicates
Reason for petition: Motion to Suspend Council Representation until elections are held
Relevant part(s) of the Constitution / legislation:
ELECTED AND ACCOUNTABLE COUNCIL ACT 2020§I.II The governments of European Union member states may not appoint or dismiss their Councillor without following an official democratic process outlined in this Act.
§V.III Any members state which violates any section of this Act, or any Councillor which continues to be unelected for four years, will be considered as having breached this Act and will have their Councillor suspended from the European Council by the European Court of Justice.
Evidence: Both recent councilors were illegally appointed by their government, circumventing the EACA and EU Law.
-
By a 4-1 vote, the ECOJ will hear the case of ICS Church v. Alkharya @BrumBrum @Syndical-Union
By a unanimous vote, the ECOJ will hear the case of Charles Michel v. Union of Syndicates. By also the same vote, the ECOJ will hear Charles Michel v. Union of Syndicates with a pace of Expeditecy and priority. @Fremet @Syndical-Union
-
Petitioner(s): The Government of the Federation of Istkalen
Petitionee(s): the state known as the United Duchies
Reason for petition: Violations of right of association, in recent mass arrests.
Relevant part(s) of the Constitution / legislation: Section XIX of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Evidence:
A) http://nseuropeanunion.com/topic/768/rtd-24/16
i. In which the Government of the United Duchies declares the Union of Syndicates a terrorist association. Let it be known, several parts of the state apparatus had been seized by terrorists at the time; however, this has ended. The current government has no affiliation or desire to be affiliated with terrorists or terrorism.
B) http://nseuropeanunion.com/topic/768/rtd-24/18
ii. In which the Government of the United Duchies, following the expulsion of terrorists from their shaky control of parts of the state apparatus in Kiel, confirms mass arrests of leftist politicians, at least partially because of "connections to foreign hostile regimes supporting terrorism," which we may infer includes the Union of Syndicates and political parties registered therin, which we have already demonstrated to be without affiliation or desire to be affiliated with terrorists or terrorism. Because of the vagueness of this statement, as well as of the initial declaration of the Union of Syndicates as a terrorist actor, this could very well be on charges perhaps ridiculous enough as to allow for the arrest of individuals simply for having an entirely personal relationship with a civil servant - a clerk, for example.
C) http://nseuropeanunion.com/topic/768/rtd-24/19
iii. In which the Government of the United Duchies continues mass arrests for reasons already stated based upon association.Remedy: Release of all those arrested for associating with, at the very least, the Government of the Union of Syndicates; if "The Left" is found, by this action, to be without ties to terrorism, then it must be re-included as a party able to participate in elections. One hundred hours of community service each for the High Duke and Prime Minister of the United Duchies.
-
Petitioner(s): Gertrude Echteran Children's Choir
Petitionee(s): the Empire of Inimicus
Reason for petition: Violations of right to freedom of expression, of habeas corpus, of freedom from torture.
Relevant sections of constitution: Sections V, IX, XVII of the UDoHR
Confirmed Evidence:
- Presence of lèse-majesté laws in the Empire of Inimicus. Similar comments have been made towards other individuals without being considered slander or a call to violence; it thus can be argued that said laws are an infringement upon the right to freedom of expression. While this specific allegation may not be a triable offense, there is no evidence to suggest that said laws have been repealed, meaning that the Empire may be continuing to violate the principle of freedom of speech. This is the sole piece of confirmed evidence that the Gertrude Echteran Children's Choir can present; however, there exists much more which establish repressive behavior as a constant in the Empire of Inimicus, as well as testimony that points to possible human rights abuses.
Testimony:
- Several violations of human rights are alleged by the reporter Sophie Brierley, who claims to have been detained arbitrarily in violation of the constitutional right to habeas corpus, and also to have been tortured. Additional claims of the detention of other political figures and of the presence of "political refugees," which implies suppression of the right to freedom of expression in the Empire of Inimicus, are made. It must be noted that Sophie Brierley has not been heard from since a time soon after the publication of this article.
Evidence indirectly hinting towards general and consistent repressive behavior in the Empire of Inimicus:
- The Gertrude Echteran Children's Choir mourns the death of these cardinals, even several years on, for no life should be taken away so early. It is not their deaths that we wish to comment on, as well. Rather, it is the mildly suspicious circumstances under which they were living. Firstly, it is stated that they were the victims of repeated threats by some of the supporters of the Emperor of Inimicus. If such supporters do, in fact, threaten those who disagree with the Emperor in such ways, to an extent that they must be hidden away in such away, there evidently exists a repressive environment regarding freedom of expression in the Empire of Inimicus, potentially encouraged by the Emperor. At the same time, the wording in this article suggests that the given Cardinals were in fact being detained and possibly prevented from speaking, which is somewhat worrying, although this is not a line we wish to pursue.
- Possible lack of accountability regarding corruption; it appears as though the Emperor is the only individual who may initiate any sort of audit of himself, which is worrying. While this is not a violation of any right per se, it helps to establish a picture of the general state of affairs in the Empire of Inimicus.
- Contempt for certain democratic principles - of the independent legislature - demonstrated to an extent. Potential propaganda - manipulation of the media and thus the public towards less democratic conclusions is possible. We would like to state that the power of the media is strong, especially in the influencing of people's opinions.
- Suspicious behavior towards protestors. While this cannot be confirmed, given evidence already presented, what is conveyed here may not be the full truth.
Remedy: Arrest of those involved in this repression, especially Emperor Artabanos, for crimes against humanity. While this is drastic action, our analysis of the situation appears to show that the only way these abuses may be halted is through the removal of those involved, who have begun, as shown by evidence, to adopt a cult of personality.
-
Petitioner(s): Yuridiana Yahontov, Interim Deputy Councilor for the Kingdom of Reitzmag
Petitionee(s): The Federation of Istkalen
Reason for petition: Acts of aggression and terrorism against all member-states of the European Union
Relevant part(s) of the Constitution / legislation: Section 1-3 Paragraph 1 of the Anti Terrorism Act of 2006
Evidence: Declaration of War of the Government of the Federation of Istkalen
Remedy: Suspension of membership to the European Union and Formal Condemnation of the Federation of Istkalen's aggressive actions -
Petitioner: Gertrude Echteran
Petitionee: Premier Commissioner Walter Cocx
Reason for Petition: The Premier Commissioner, under the European Commission Sanctioning Powers Act 2020, submitted a sanction motion against Istkalen without the recorded approval of any other Commissioner, thus violating said act, which requires a unanimous Commission in order to submit a Sanction Motion to the Council. This occurred twice before, with the submission of two sanction motions against the UNSR, neither of which gained the explicit approval of any other Commissioner, save for the first, in which Commissioner Birdane stated that she would support a motion against the UNSR that would allow for the survival of the people of the UNSR, while never giving her agreement to any of the drafts proposed by Commissioner Cocx.
Evidence: Commission debate regarding Sanction Motions; European Commission Sanctioning Powers Act.
Remedy: The immediate withdrawal of any present Sanction Motion acts made without the approval of the whole of the Commission
-
Gertrude Echteran withdraws her motion against the Premier Commissioner.
-
The Republic of Istkalen withdraws its case against the United Duchies.
-
Petitioner(s): The Government of the Kingdom of Reitzmag
Petitionee(s): The United Dominions of Icholasen
Reason for petition: incitment of violence and terrorism
Relevant part(s) of the Constitution / legislation:- Section II Paragraph III of Anti-Terrorism Act of 2006
- Section II Paragraph IV Clauses A to E of Anti-Terrorism Act of 2006
Evidence: Destruction of Buildings occupied by Reitzmics in Copala City by Nicolezians fleeing to the United Duchies with the use of bombs.
Remedy: Compensation in cash for total cost of damages -
@Kingdom-of-Reitzmag The petition of the Government of the Kingdom of Reitzmag against the United Dominions of Icholasen has been accepted. A solicitor representing the petitioner is hereby summoned to the Court.
ECoJ Clerk of Court
-
Petitioner(s): Keeva Donohue Cèamp
Petitionee(s): Strathaen Government
Reason for petition: Breach of ARTICLE V. THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Section IV. Freedom from Slavery by forcing all citizens to provide free labour to community programmes under threat of fines or imprisonment. Also of Section "XX. Right to Democratic Governance
Relevant part(s) of the Constitution / legislation: ARTICLE V. THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Section IV. Freedom from Slavery
Evidence: http://nseuropeanunion.com/topic/1020/community-duty-programme -
Petitioner(s): Orrin McGill Sgot
Petitionee(s): Mennrimiak Government
Reason for petition:I am a reformed Breizhighist Strathen who was kicked out of the country based on my nationality and culture. This is a violations of protections against population transfer or forcible movement based on innate characteristics of a group including: a group's culture, religion, sexual orientation, political beliefs or other protected statuses as outlined in the UDoHR . The government have kicked out a whole nationality on pretense of extremism when there is no evidence all are extreme , essentially punishing a whole nationality for the actions of a government leader who was extreme and has refused to remove measures when a new government was elected that no longer is pushing for the policies of the old government. This is clear discrimination of a group based on nationality and culture both protected characteristics.I seek the overturn of this ban and travel ban so that no one is denied unless there is evidence the individual shows threat of extremism or threat to national security
Relevant part(s) of the Constitution / legislation: III. Population transfer, defined as the forcible movement, imposed by an authority, of a large group of people from one region to another, for reasons relating to innate characteristics of a group including: a group's culture, religion, sexual orientation, political beliefs or other protected statuses as outlined in the UDoHR, is recognized as a violation of the right of freedom of movement and is thus prohibited.
Evidence:http://nseuropeanunion.com/topic/340/mennrimiak-news-media/31
Remedy:Removal of discriminatory law and restablishment of visas that were unfairly cancelled -
@Kingdom-of-Reitzmag the case Keeva Donohue Cèamp v. Strathae is hereby REJECTED on the following grounds:
- Lack of a proposed remedy, as described in the European Court of Justice Case Procedures Act 2013.
- Lack of standing of petitioner to file on behalf of claimant. ((OOC: Petitioner is filing on behalf of another player with intent for other player to litigate. The litigant must be the one that files.))
ECoJ Clerk of Court
-
Petitioner(s): Park Yeon-mi
Petitionee(s): Government of Strathae
Reason for petition: Breach of ARTICLE V. THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS:- Section IV by forcing all citizens to provide free labour to community programmes under threat of fines or imprisonment
- Section XX. Right to Democratic Governance
Relevant part(s) of the Constitution / legislation: ARTICLE V. THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Section IV. Freedom from Slavery
Evidence: http://nseuropeanunion.com/topic/1020/community-duty-programme
Remedy: Cease and Desist Order to the Government of Strathae -
Petitioner(s): the Government of the Republic of Istkalen
Petitionee(s): the Joint Transitional Authority for Istkalen
Reason for petition: During the short war, the Reitzmo-Vardic Coalition, in an attempt to procure surrender, intentionally attempted, successfully to destroy civilian areas without combatants or military importance - facts known well to them - in an attempt to procure the surrender of Istkalen, later discovered to be not for national safety but rather for the purpose of economic exploitation. Because that which was destroyed and those who died in this bombardment were not of military importance of combatants, nor were the results of the bombardments an example of "collateral damage," this constitutes arbitrary deprivation of life. Added to this, there is also evidence of this being a premeditated move, meaning that the Reitzmic armed forces had previously investigated the areas destroyed, found them to be without combatants or military importance, and decided it a good idea to fire upon them.
Following this, Reitzmic soldiers invaded, temporarily, every building in the zone then occupied, violating wantonly many people's homes for reasons that remain unknown. We will, however, not press charges regarding this, as it may have been necessary.
This being the fault of the Reitzmo-Vardic Coalition, now represented as the J-TAI, we find it fit to be included.
During the occupation, Istkalen itself was forcibly abolished by the Joint Transitional Authority in Istkalen, a body whose goal it was to impose a manifesto, which continues to remain unknown to everyone but the members of the J-TAI, on Istkalen without the consultation of the people of Istkalen, establishing a legislature that initially had no Istkalener representatives and continues to have none. Even if it did, they would constitute a minority, violating the principle that government must be based on the will of the people.
We view the abolition as illegal, as it constituted an arbitrary deprivation of citizenship and nationality, and thus of rights as well. Indeed, immediately afterward, the J-TAI attempted to persecute journalists alleged to be spreading "misinformation," a clear violation of the right to freedom of expression. At the same time, it severely restricted movement out and in from Istkalen, requiring special exemption from the J-TAI itself to leave, effectively depriving the vast majority of Istkaleners from the right to freedom of movement.
On top of this, under the J-TAI, Istkalen has no unbiased court system. This was best illustrated by the ability of the J-TAI appointed foreign legislature to airily dismiss hundreds of allegations of rape and violence on the part of occupiers at once, without investigation. We do not say that these allegations are true, but we were investigating them; the J-TAI, however, put a stop to this, very suspiciously. This is again, a violation of rights.
Relevant part(s) of the Constitution / legislation: Article V, Section III; Article V, Section VIII; Article V, Section XIII; Article V, Section XV; Article V, Section XVIII; Article V, Section XX
Evidence:
http://nseuropeanunion.com/topic/899/operation-rule-britannia/13
- Firing on of civilian areas
http://nseuropeanunion.com/topic/899/operation-rule-britannia/11
- Premeditation of firing
http://nseuropeanunion.com/topic/915/official-bulletin-joint-transitional-authority-for-istkalen/2
- wanton violation of human rights
Remedy:
Extradition of General Peter Renwalt, among other identified war criminals, to stand trial for war crimes in Istkalen. Handover and reparation for all stolen property; renegotiation of present means of reparation for war damages caused by the Istkalener state. Release of state officials imprisoned by the J-TAI.
-
The European Court of Justice thanks all petitioners for their cases, and apologises for the delay in processing. Nevertheless, the Court has decided the following:
- The petition of the Gertrude Echteran Children's Choir ( @Istkalen ) against the Empire of Inimicus, dated 19th March 2021, has been ACCEPTED. Solicitors representing the petitioner and petitionee shall be called to the court forthwith.
- The petition of Yuridiana Yahontov, Councillor for the @Kingdom-of-Reitzmag against the Federation of Istkalen, dated 16th April 2021, is REJECTED, on the grounds that the legal and political situation in the Federation of Istkalen (or any iterations thereof) has changed substantially since the filing of the petition.
- The petition of Orrin McGill Sgot ( @BrumBrum ) against the Mennrimiak Government, dated 9th July 2021, has been ACCEPTED. Solicitors representing the petitioner and petitionee shall be called to the court forthwith.
- The petition of the Government of the Republic of Istkalen against the Joint Transitional Authority for Istkalen has been ACCEPTED. Solicitors representing the petitioner and petitionee shall be called to the court forthwith.
Benjamin STEYN
Chief Justice of the ECoJ -
Petitioner(s): Marine Marchand
Petitionee(s): the Kingdom of Reitzmag
Reason for petition: On the 7th of March, 2021, I was arrested by security forces of the Kingdom of Reitzmag for alleged crimes I committed on Nicoleizian soil, shortly before the suspension of autonomy, on the charge of "state larceny," which does not exist in Nicoleizian law. I was, for this crime, sentenced to life imprisonment, unusual and harsher in comparison to the sentences given to others who committed crimes similar to mine - rebellion, the equivalent to Reitzmic "state larceny," usually does not carry a life sentence. While I understand that violence did occur as a result of my crime, I was not responsible for this violence, nor was the state which I governed at the time - it was entirely spontaneous violence caused by the people of Bomballey at the time. This constitutes primarily a violation of my freedom from presumed or retroactive guilt, as I was tried for a crime which did not exist in the territory in which I was committing it in at the time, and furthermore my right to legal remedy, as my rights were violated as a result of actions on Nicoleizian soil and yet I was unable to access a competent Nicoleizian tribunal due to the actions of the Reitzmic government. The unusuality of a life sentence may also be a cruel, unusual, and inhumane punishment.
Relevant part(s) of the Constitution / legislation: Article V, Section XI, clause II; Article V, Section VIII; Article V, Section V, clause IV.
Evidence:
I. The Treaty of Buckingham, which established Nicoleizian sovereignty over the area in which I committed the alleged crime in question
II. Reitzmic suspension of Nicoleizian sovereignty over the area in question, which occurred after I committed the alleged crime:
III. My arrest by Reitzmic authorities for declaring the independence of Bomballey while it was still a Nicoleizian territory, and thus not subject to Reitzmic law - "state larceny" under Reitzmic law, a crime which exists nowhere else, especially not under Nicoleizian law.
IV. My sentencing to life imprisonment by Reitzmic authorities for the crime of "state larceny" committed on Nicoleizian soil
Remedy: Overturning of the original Reitzmic sentence; extradition from Reitzmag as to stand trial, before a Nicoleizian court, for the crimes I likely committed in the territory of Icholasen.
-
Petitioner(s): Imperial Consul Simge Galanth of the Empire of Inimicus
Petitionee(s): the Government of the Clan Democracy of Strathae
Reason for petition: violation of the right to privacy, freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, freedom of association
Relevant part(s) of the Constitution / legislation: Universal Declaration of Human Rights Articles XII, XVII, XVIII, XIX
Evidence:
-
Official proclamation of the Strathae Foreign Office restricting the singing of popular anthems, on pain of attendance bans and movement restrictions, and enforced by private investigators and contra-constitutional internet measures.
-
Repeated media accusations by free journalists of repression and state-sanctioned tyranny in the Clan Democracy of Strathae
-
Media reports detailing the Strathae government's absolute control over the opinions and expressive rights of its citizens
Remedy: immediate revocation of the association between UEFA and Strathae sports associations; monetary fines to Strathae sports organisations; imprisonment of those at the head of Strathae sports organisations.
-
-
Petitioner(s): Devon Albert, The Nationals' candidate in the 2022 councillor elections in Elthize
Petitionee(s): The Government of The State of Elthize & Greenwich Grimwald, President of The State of Elthize
Reason for the petition: The recall of Liam Zachary from the position of Councillor for Elthize
Relevant part(s) of the Constitution/legislation: Section XX, Clause I and III of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Section XX. Right to Democratic Governance
I. Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
III. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government.Remedy: Liam Zachary returns to his position as Councillor for The State of Elthize and serves until the next general election of the country.
-
The ECoJ has voted (3-1) to reject the petition of Devon Albert.
Juan Luis López Guerra
Chief Justice of the ECoJ
The Kingdom of Spain