NS European Union

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Discord

    Motion on the Status of the Strait of Adventuranza

    European Council
    16
    38
    3391
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Yosai
      Yosai EU last edited by

      Councillor Izumi Miwako spoke her peace.

      "I would second the request from Councillor Tilkanas for a debate extension. We support any resolution which allows both the Federal Republic of Yosai and the Kingdom of Spain equal share of the Strait of Adventuranza or Red Strait and allowing both nations the freedom to conduct and impliment their own laws in their respective portions of the waters in said Strait. Nothing more or less. It's that simple."

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Spain
        Spain last edited by

        Debate will be extended for 24 hours, until 22:52 GMT on November 8th, 2021.

        Donald Tusk
        Deputy Speaker and Councillor for Spain

        The Kingdom of Spain
        His Majesty the King, Felipe VI
        President Alberto Núñez-Feijóo
        Councillor and Council Speaker Donald Tusk

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Istkalen
          Istkalen EU last edited by Istkalen

          [OOC: edits for formatting issues]

          I propose the following amendments:

          AMENDMENT I

          The name of this motion shall be changed to "Motion on the Status of the Red Strait," in place of its present name.


          AMENDMENT II

          PREAMBLE

          A motion to temporarily create an international zone in the Strait of Adventuranza Red Strait in order to prevent an outbreak of conflict, in consideration of the recent deployment of Inimican and Reitzmic naval forces, as well as the current dispute, in the region.

          SECTION I: The Internationality of the Strait

          I. Until the production of a final settlement of the ultimate sovereignty of the Strait of Adventuranza Red Strait, agreed to by both the Kingdom of Spain and the Federal Republic of Yosai, the European Union declares the Strait of Adventuraza Red Strait a zone over which no entity holds sovereignty over. Traffic and trade in this zone may be regulated only by treaty that all state actors conducting trade and traffic through the zone agree to while this motion is active.

          II. The above excludes the harbors and ports of the Kingdom of Spain and the Federal Republic of Yosai, as well as associated islands in the Strait of Adventuraza Red Strait.

          III. A moratorium on the exploitation of maritime resources 12 nm from any coastlines as long as the territory remains without defined sovereignty, will exist.

          IV. The Kingdom of Spain will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines, but will not have sovereignty over this area.

          V. The Federal Republic of Yosai will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines, but will not have sovereignty over this area.

          SECTION II: On a Final Settlement

          I. Upon the creation of a final settlement on the ultimate sovereignty of the Strait of Adventuranza Red Strait, agreed to by both the Kingdom of Spain and the Federal Republic of Yosai, this motion will be made null and void, and will be superceded by said final settlement.


          AMENDMENT III

          III. A moratorium on the exploitation of maritime resources 12 nm from any coastlines along and within the Red Strait as long as the territory Red Strait remains without defined sovereignty, will exist.

          IV. The Kingdom of Spain will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines along and within the Red Strait, but will not have sovereignty over this area.

          V. The Federal Republic of Yosai will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines along and within the Red Strait, but will not have sovereignty over this area.


          Firstly, I do not think it is appropriate for the Union to be using the name "Strait of Adventuranza," which was a name first developed by Spanish explorers in the 1400s before promptly disappearing into the annals of history for the next 600 or so years, resurfacing only in the year 2020, when it was used by the Kingdom of Spain after it claimed major parts of the strait. This name is presently being used to justify the claims to the Strait; the EU should not endorse any claims at all, and thus should not be using this name. The name "Red Strait" has been used in its place, as it predates the Spanish name, if I understand it correctly, was more common prior to 2020, and does not carry the same political connotations.

          My third amendment addresses the concerns of Councillor Yahontov.

          Iras Tilkanas
          Councillor for the Republic of Istkalen

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Spain
            Spain last edited by

            It seems that someone in the room has turned crazy about imperialism and piracy, trying to even accuse me of such things without knowing what my amendment will be about. It is, in fact, insulting to me that I am accused or my country is accussed of piracy for trying to submit an amendment. However, I love to prove people wrong from time to time, and today Councillor Tilkanas, I think it will be you who will be proved wrong, as it is not on the Spanish interests to establish a European level tax. These are my amendments:

            Amendment I

            IV. The Kingdom of Spain will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines along and within the Strait of Adventuranza, but will not have sovereignty over this area.

            Amendment II

            V. The Federal Republic of Yosai will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines along and within the Strait of Adventuranza, but will not have sovereignty over this area.

            Amendment III

            IV. The Kingdom of Spain will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines along and within the Strait of Adventuranza, having sovereignty over this area. but will not have sovereignty over this area.


            Debate is now over. It is time to vote on amendments. There are SIX amendments, which have been proposed by Councillor Tilkanas and myself, Councillor Tusk. The amendments are thus:

            Amendment I - Proposed by Cllr. Tusk

            IV. The Kingdom of Spain will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines along and within the Strait of Adventuranza, but will not have sovereignty over this area.

            Amendment II - Proposed by Cllr. Tusk

            V. The Federal Republic of Yosai will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines along and within the Strait of Adventuranza, but will not have sovereignty over this area.

            Amendment III - Proposed by Cllr. Tusk

            IV. The Kingdom of Spain will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines along and within the Strait of Adventuranza, having sovereignty over this area. but will not have sovereignty over this area.

            Amendment IV - Proposed by Cllr. Tilkanas

            The name of this motion shall be changed to "Motion on the Status of the Red Strait," in place of its present name.

            Amendment V - Proposed by Cllr. Tilkanas

            PREAMBLE

            A motion to temporarily create an international zone in the Strait of Adventuranza Red Strait in order to prevent an outbreak of conflict, in consideration of the recent deployment of Inimican and Reitzmic naval forces, as well as the current dispute, in the region.

            SECTION I: The Internationality of the Strait

            I. Until the production of a final settlement of the ultimate sovereignty of the Strait of Adventuranza Red Strait, agreed to by both the Kingdom of Spain and the Federal Republic of Yosai, the European Union declares the Strait of Adventuraza Red Strait a zone over which no entity holds sovereignty over. Traffic and trade in this zone may be regulated only by treaty that all state actors conducting trade and traffic through the zone agree to while this motion is active.

            II. The above excludes the harbors and ports of the Kingdom of Spain and the Federal Republic of Yosai, as well as associated islands in the Strait of Adventuraza Red Strait.

            III. A moratorium on the exploitation of maritime resources 12 nm from any coastlines as long as the territory remains without defined sovereignty, will exist.

            IV. The Kingdom of Spain will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines, but will not have sovereignty over this area.

            V. The Federal Republic of Yosai will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines, but will not have sovereignty over this area.

            SECTION II: On a Final Settlement

            I. Upon the creation of a final settlement on the ultimate sovereignty of the Strait of Adventuranza Red Strait, agreed to by both the Kingdom of Spain and the Federal Republic of Yosai, this motion will be made null and void, and will be superceded by said final settlement.

            Amendment VI - Proposed by Cllr. Tilkanas

            III. A moratorium on the exploitation of maritime resources 12 nm from any coastlines along and within the Red Strait as long as the territory Red Strait remains without defined sovereignty, will exist.

            IV. The Kingdom of Spain will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines along and within the Red Strait, but will not have sovereignty over this area.

            V. The Federal Republic of Yosai will be recognized as having exclusive rights for the exploitation of maritime resources conducted within 12 nm from its coastlines along and within the Red Strait, but will not have sovereignty over this area.


            Voting on amendments will commence NOW and will last until 22:52 GMT on November 11th, 2021.


            I vote FOR amendments I, II and III and AGAINST amendments IV, V and VI.

            Donald Tusk
            Deputy Speaker and Councillor for Spain

            The Kingdom of Spain
            His Majesty the King, Felipe VI
            President Alberto Núñez-Feijóo
            Councillor and Council Speaker Donald Tusk

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Istkalen
              Istkalen EU last edited by

              The intention is for this to be impermanent, not a permanent solution. I vote FOR Amendments IV, V, and VI, and AGAINST all other amendments.

              Iras Tilkanas
              Councillor for the Republic of Istkalen

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Kingdom of Reitzmag
                Kingdom of Reitzmag Eurocorps last edited by

                I vote FOR Amendments IV, V, VI and AGAINST all other amendments.

                Yuridiana Yahontov
                Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag

                alt text

                HM King George
                Monarch

                Sir Simon Bridges GCB KCMG GCT MP
                Prime Minister

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • BrumBrum
                  BrumBrum Commission last edited by

                  I vote FOR Amendments I,II and III and AGAINST all other amendments.
                  James Mizrachi-Roscoe,Councillour for United Duchies

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Inimicus
                    Inimicus EU last edited by

                    The Empire of Inimicus votes FOR Amendments I, II, and III, and AGAINST all other Amendments.

                    Nicholas Benfield
                    Cllr for Inimicus

                    The Empire of Inimicus
                    Head of State/Government: Emperor Artabanos (EU Hall of Fame 2021)
                    Vicarius (Deputy): Wilfred Cocx
                    Deputy Speaker of the European Council: Nicholas Benfield

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Vayinaod
                      Vayinaod EU last edited by

                      The Archrepublic of Vayinaod votes as follows: FOR Amendments IV, V, VI and AGAINST all other amendments.

                      Carita Falk
                      Councilor for the Archrepublic of Vayinaod

                      Arch-Konsul: Kristian Nylund (Greens)
                      Ruling Coalition: Greens, Moderates
                      EU Councillor : Carita Falk (Greens-Independent)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        Montenbourg EU last edited by

                        The Kingdom of Montenbourg votes FOR Amendments I, II, and III, and AGAINST all other Amendments.

                        Emma Granger
                        Councillor for Montenbourg

                        🇩🇰 The Kingdom of Montenbourg
                        👑HM Victoria the First, Queen of Montenbourg
                        🏛️PM Rt. Hon. Birgitte Nyborg
                        🌟 Councillor Emma Granger.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Yosai
                          Yosai EU last edited by Yosai

                          The Federal Republic of Yosai votes as follows: FOR Amendments IV, V, VI and AGAINST all other amendments.

                          Izumi Miwako
                          Councillor of the Federal Republic of Yosai

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Gadalland and Aspern
                            Gadalland and Aspern EU last edited by

                            Gadalland and Aspern votes FOR Amendments I, II and III and against all other amendments.

                            Éduditalle Dína
                            European Councillor

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C
                              Czech Slavia EU last edited by

                              I vote FOR Amendments I. and II., AGAINST Amendment III. and ABSTAIN on Amendments IV. ,V. and VI..

                              Václav Kohout
                              Councillor for Czech Slavia

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Mennrimiak
                                Mennrimiak EU last edited by Mennrimiak

                                The United Kingdoms of Mennrimiak vote FOR amendments I II and IV but AGANIST all others

                                Ville Niinistö
                                Councillor for Mennrimiak


                                The events descibed on this post are FICTIONAL and not meant to offend or criticize any existing person, Neither do i own any of the work shown on this post, Credit belongs to their respective owners.
                                DO NOT TAKE ANY PART OF THIS POST AS A TRUE FACT

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Duxburian Union
                                  Duxburian Union EU last edited by

                                  The Union of Duxburian Dominions votes FOR Amendments IV, V, VI and AGAINST all other amendments.

                                  Wesley Greene
                                  Councillor of the Duxburian Union

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Fremet
                                    Fremet EU last edited by

                                    The Republic of Fremet votes FOR Amendments IV, V, and VI and AGAINST all other amendments.

                                    Charles Michel
                                    Council Speaker and Councilor for Fremet

                                    Statsminister Erna Solberg
                                    EU Cllr Charles Michel
                                    #FortressFremet

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Fayrrendel
                                      Fayrrendel EU last edited by

                                      The Realm of Great Ruthund ABSTAINS on amendments I, II, and III and votes FOR amendments IV, V, and VI.

                                      Prince-Councilor Tony Odhinazen
                                      EU Councilor for Ruthund

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Nofoaga
                                        Nofoaga EU last edited by

                                        The Republic of Nofoaga ABSTAINS from voting.

                                        Mrs. Paul-Gabrielle Muzhare
                                        EU Councillor for the Republic of Nofoaga

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • GANIA
                                          GANIA EU last edited by GANIA

                                          GANIA vote FOR amendments I II and IV but AGANIST all others

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Istkalen
                                            Istkalen EU last edited by

                                            With the resolution of the issue at hand, as well as the fact that this legislation been overdue for vote for over three weeks, I withdraw this motion, as it no longer has any purpose.

                                            Iras Tilkanas
                                            Councillor for the Republic of Istkalen

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Our forums are maintained by volunteers. Consider donating to help us cover our monthly expenses and keep everything up and running Donate