Sanction Motion against the Federation of Istkalen
-
Debate on this begins NOW and ends 28 April 2021 at 17h00 GMT.
Charles Michel
Council Speaker and Councilor for Fremet -
(OOC: Please correct me if I am wrong)
Istkalen, of course, opposes this. While we understand the motivations behind this motion, we believe it to be illegal. No other Commissioner, save for the Premier, gave their explicit approval to this motion; as such, it has no right to be here.
The Federation of Istkalen no longer exists; I assume that the transitional authority will be allowed to send representation here. If not, then evidently there is a problem.
Gertrude Echteran
Councillor for Istkalen -
Debate has ENDED. We will now move to final voting, which begins NOW and ends 2 May 2021 at 12h00 GMT.
On behalf of the Republic of Fremet, I vote FOR this motion.
Charles Michel
Council Speaker and Councilor for Fremet -
The illegality of this motion is beyond amazing. As a result, I vote AGAINST this motion. A case against Premier Cocx will be brought to the European Court of Justice at short notice.
Gertrude Echteran
Councillor for Istkalen -
On behalf of the Republic of Nofoaga, I vot FOR this motion.
Mrs. Paul-Gabrielle Muzhare
EU councilor for the Republic of Nofoaga -
The Empire of Inimicus vote FOR this motion.
Nicholas Benfield
-
The Realm of Great Ruthund votes FOR this motion.
Tony Odhinazen
EU Councilor, Ruthund -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Montenbourg, I vote FOR this motion.
Emma Granger
Councillor for Montenbourg -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Spain, I vote FOR this motion.
Donald Tusk
Deputy Speaker and Councillor for Spain -
On behalf of United Duchies I vote AGAINST this motion
James Mizrachi-Roscoe, Councillor for United Duchies -
On behalf of the Commonwealth of Leagio, I vote AGAINST this motion.
Francis Plessis
EU Councilor for Leagio -
On behalf of the Democratic Republic of Czech Slavia, I vote AGAINST this motion.
Václav Kohout
Councillor for Czech Slavia -
I think that the provisions of this sanction motion would make it harder for J-TAI to accomplish their mission in restoring and reforming Istkalen. There fore, I vote AGAINST this motion.
Yuridiana Yahontov
Interim Deputy Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag -
Final voting has CLOSED.
With 6 votes FOR, 5 votes AGAINST, and no Abstentions, the Sanction Motion Against the Federation of Istkalen has PASSED.Charles Michel
Council Speaker and Councilor for Fremet -
I have calculated, Mr. Speaker, and it seems as though this motion has not garnered a 55% majority, which is required by the Constitution for proposals passing by a simple majority in order to pass. 6 out of 11 were for - this amounts to about 54.54%, which, while rounding to 55%, is not 55%. I refer to Article II, Section III, Clause IV of the Constitution in this.
Iras Tilkanas
Councillor for the Republic of Istkalen -
Mmm indeed. Thank you for catching this error. The individuals responsible have been sacked, those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked, have been sacked, and all have been expelled to Dromund Kaas.
I have updated the record.
With 6 votes FOR, 5 votes AGAINST, and no Abstentions, the Sanction Motion Against the Federation of Istkalen has FAILED to meet the constitutional requirements of a simple majority vote (55% of those present).
Charles Michel
Council Speaker and Councilor for Fremet
The Kingdom of Spain
