Eastern Haane Intervention Motion
-
Hon. Tusk, think you do not understand. My country has the sole sovereignty over its armed forces. We did not enter the European Union for its esteemed institutions to control even our Armed Forces. There is no act or part from the EU Constitution that allows the EU to gain control over a member-state's armed force. We will not follow any foreign directive that had been decided without our consultation. As of now, we don't think that we need to intervene in Eastern Haane. The refugees we retrieved had burnt the temporary housing we installed for them. We have given all the care we could even if it is dangerous. But, I think it would be better if the only state trusted by the Haaneans would intervene. Hence, I suggest that the EU lets Austria to do the job.
Gen. Sir Mark Carleton-Smith
Chief of Staff, Royal Army -
(OOC: No, no, and no. As far as I can tell, masters cannot intervene on the behalf of their puppets.)
The Federal Republic of Austria will maintain its neutrality, and will not intervene here nor anywhere else. We have let the Haaneans establish their own government in exile not out of support but out of simple kindness, a kindness that all should have. All peoples, in our minds, should be completely sovereign over their own affairs.
We do not believe ourselves to be more or less trusted by the Haanean people, either, and do not even have a military, nor intend to create one.
In short, all that you have said regarding our state and our country is entirely untrue; all that you have demanded will not come to be.
Eugen Freund
Councillor for the Federal Republic of Austria -
Hon. Freund, your country is the only state trusted by the Haaneans. I can infer that political ideology had impacted the Haaneans' decision to be against us. It is very well taught in Reitzmic Military School that political ideology should be set aside during missions. I think we should just drop aid to the Haaneans and leave them alone. The Austrians can also do the job. By the way, GCHQ is currently deciding whether we will pull out of the area. That is all I can say for now.
Gen. Sir Mark Carleton-Smith
Chief of Staff, Royal Army -
I must repeat that we have no military, nor do we intend to create one. Such an action would result in the removal of the entire administration from power. At the same time, as far as I can infer from the various releases from the Republic and from Eastern Haane, this has very little to do with political ideology, and more to do with the fact that you were an occupying force. No one wants to be occupied, for it is an encroachment upon the autonomy of nations.
Again, we do not believe ourselves to be trusted by the Haaneans any more than any other nation. We will remain with our policy of neutrality. You cannot dictate for us what our government should or should not do.
Eugen Freund
Councillor for the Federal Republic of Eastern Haane -
Debate is now over. It is time to vote on amendments. There are two amendments, both proposed by Councillor Falk:
Amendment I
-
This coalition of willing members shall be lead by a commissioned flag officer who shall be appointed by the Premier Commissioner on the consent of participating members. This flag officer shall be from a nation with no previous attachment to operations within Eastern Haane.
-
The coalition shall only have legal merit until the 31st of December, 2020. The European Council in the weeks proceeding this expiration shall consider an additional three month extension.
Amendment II
-
Members of the Coalition intervening in Eastern Haane must inform and brief the European Council on their actions in the territory of Eastern Haane at least once every
fortnight96 Hours. -
Any member state intervening in Eastern Haane, or continuing to do so after the passage of this motion, is hereby condemned by the European Council and may face legal action in the European Court of Justice.
a. Member states intervening in Eastern Haane outside of the Coalition, who then join said Coalition within 48 hours of the passage of this motion, may be exempt from measures under this section.
b. Any member-states which have engage in open combat with any native elements or groups within Eastern Haane shall not be allowed to take part in further military actions in the nation even as part of the coalition. These member-states shall be allowed to continue humanitarian and medical actions under supervision from the coalition commander. This section shall be appealable to the coalition commander
Voting on amendments begins NOW and will last until 07:30 GMT on October 6th, 2020.
I vote FOR both amendments.
Edward Firoux
Council Speaker and Councillor for Inquista -
-
On behalf of the Kingdom of Reitzmag, I vote FOR Amendment I and AGAINST Amendment II.
Friedrich van Allen
Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Spain, I vote FOR both amendments.
Donald D. Tusk
Councillor for Spain -
The Empire of Inimicus votes FOR both Amendments.
Cllr Hetty Tilki
Empire of Inimicus -
On behalf of the United Duchies I vote FOR both amendments
Mr Tobias Farage Johnson -
On behalf of the Commonwealth of Leagio, I vote FOR both Amendments.
Francis Plessis
EU Councilor for Leagio -
On behalf of the Archrepublic of Vayinaod, I vote FOR both amendments.
Cllr. Carita Falk
-
On behalf of the Kingdom of Fremet, I vote FOR both amendments.
Charles Michel
Councilor for the Kingdom of Fremet -
I vote FOR both amendments.
Mrs. Paul-Gabrielle Muzhare
EU Councilor for the Republic of Nofoaga -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Montenbourg, I vote FOR both amendments.
Emma Granger
Councillor for Montenbourg -
On behalf of the Democratic Republic of Czech Slavia, I vote FOR both amendments.
Václav Kohout
Councillor for the Democratic Republic of Czech Slavia -
With 11 votes for, Amendment I has PASSED. With 10 votes for and 1 against, Amendment II has PASSED. The legislation has now been updated to reflect the passed amendments.
Final voting begins NOW and will last until 021:30 GMT on October 9th, 2020.
On behalf of the Most Blessed State of Inquista, I vote FOR this motion.
Edward Firoux
Council Speaker and Councillor for Inquista -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Spain, I vote FOR this motion.
Donald D. Tusk
Councillor for Spain -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Fremet, I vote FOR this motion.
Charles Michel
Councilor for the Kingdom of Fremet -
On behalf of the Kingdom of Reitzmag, I vote AGAINST this motion.
Friedrich van Allen
Councilor, Kingdom of Reitzmag -
On behalf of the Commonwealth of Leagio, I vote FOR this motion.
Francis Plessis
EU Councilor for Leagio
The Kingdom of Spain
